[Python-checkins] r65834 - in python/trunk: Lib/distutils/cygwinccompiler.py Misc/NEWS
amaury.forgeotdarc
python-checkins at python.org
Mon Aug 18 21:23:48 CEST 2008
Author: amaury.forgeotdarc
Date: Mon Aug 18 21:23:47 2008
New Revision: 65834
Log:
#2234 distutils failed with mingw binutils 2.18.50.20080109.
Be less strict when parsing these version numbers,
they don't necessarily follow the python numbering scheme.
Modified:
python/trunk/Lib/distutils/cygwinccompiler.py
python/trunk/Misc/NEWS
Modified: python/trunk/Lib/distutils/cygwinccompiler.py
==============================================================================
--- python/trunk/Lib/distutils/cygwinccompiler.py (original)
+++ python/trunk/Lib/distutils/cygwinccompiler.py Mon Aug 18 21:23:47 2008
@@ -404,7 +404,7 @@
""" Try to find out the versions of gcc, ld and dllwrap.
If not possible it returns None for it.
"""
- from distutils.version import StrictVersion
+ from distutils.version import LooseVersion
from distutils.spawn import find_executable
import re
@@ -415,7 +415,7 @@
out.close()
result = re.search('(\d+\.\d+(\.\d+)*)',out_string)
if result:
- gcc_version = StrictVersion(result.group(1))
+ gcc_version = LooseVersion(result.group(1))
else:
gcc_version = None
else:
@@ -427,7 +427,7 @@
out.close()
result = re.search('(\d+\.\d+(\.\d+)*)',out_string)
if result:
- ld_version = StrictVersion(result.group(1))
+ ld_version = LooseVersion(result.group(1))
else:
ld_version = None
else:
@@ -439,7 +439,7 @@
out.close()
result = re.search(' (\d+\.\d+(\.\d+)*)',out_string)
if result:
- dllwrap_version = StrictVersion(result.group(1))
+ dllwrap_version = LooseVersion(result.group(1))
else:
dllwrap_version = None
else:
Modified: python/trunk/Misc/NEWS
==============================================================================
--- python/trunk/Misc/NEWS (original)
+++ python/trunk/Misc/NEWS Mon Aug 18 21:23:47 2008
@@ -48,6 +48,10 @@
Library
-------
+- Issue #2234: distutils failed for some versions of the cygwin compiler. The
+ version reported by these tools does not necessarily follow the python
+ version numbering scheme, so the module is less strict when parsing it.
+
- Issue #2235: Added Py3k warnings for types which will become unhashable
under the stricter __hash__ inheritance rules in 3.0. Several types
which did not meet the rules for hash invariants and were already
More information about the Python-checkins
mailing list