[Python-checkins] r78298 - peps/trunk/pep-0003.txt

[Georg Brandl]

Am 22.02.2010 16:04, schrieb Guido van Rossum:
> On Mon, Feb 22, 2010 at 7:38 AM, Nick Coghlan <ncoghlan at gmail.com> wrote:
>> Guido van Rossum wrote:
>>> On Sun, Feb 21, 2010 at 9:55 PM, Benjamin Peterson <benjamin at python.org> wrote:
>>>> What's the point of removing all the text, too? Why not just put a
>>>> notice on the top and preserve the text for historical record?
>>>
>>> It would also serve as a forwarding pointer to the current rules for
>>> reporting bugs.
>>
>> The pointer to the new guidelines is there (that's what replaced the old
>> text way down the bottom of the diff in the email). If anyone really
>> wants to look at the old rules, they're still available in SVN.
> 
> D'oh!
> 
> i still think that when a PEP is withdrawn its text should not be
> deleted from the website but the status changed (and a paragraph
> inserted at the front). After all we don't delete rejected PEPs
> either.
> 
> BTW Maybe http://docs.python.org/bugs.html should also be updated to
> point to http://www.python.org/dev/workflow/ .

Done!

Georg

-- 
Thus spake the Lord: Thou shalt indent with four spaces. No more, no less.
Four shall be the number of spaces thou shalt indent, and the number of thy
indenting shall be four. Eight shalt thou not indent, nor either indent thou
two, excepting that thou then proceed to four. Tabs are right out.