[Python-checkins] peps: Deferred to Python 2.1

georg.brandl python-checkins at python.org
Wed Mar 23 21:26:20 CET 2011


http://hg.python.org/peps/rev/68ded446ef9a
changeset:   136:68ded446ef9a
user:        Barry Warsaw <barry at python.org>
date:        Wed Aug 23 05:47:12 2000 +0000
summary:
  Deferred to Python 2.1

files:
  pep-0213.txt |  19 +++++++++++++++----
  1 files changed, 15 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)


diff --git a/pep-0213.txt b/pep-0213.txt
--- a/pep-0213.txt
+++ b/pep-0213.txt
@@ -1,9 +1,12 @@
 PEP: 213
 Title: Attribute Access Handlers
 Version: $Revision$
-Owner: paul at prescod.net (Paul Prescod)
-Python-Version: 2.0
-Status: Incomplete
+Author: paul at prescod.net (Paul Prescod)
+Status: Draft
+Type: Standards Track
+Python-Version: 2.1
+Created: 21-Jul-2000
+Post-History:
 
 
 Introduction
@@ -19,6 +22,7 @@
      This PEP describes a feature that makes it easier, more efficient
      and safer to implement these handlers for Python instances.
 
+
 Justification
 
     Scenario 1:
@@ -50,6 +54,7 @@
     for whatever purpose. Again, this is not a new feature but
     merely a new syntax for an existing convention.
 
+
 Current Solution
 
     To make some attributes read-only:
@@ -85,6 +90,7 @@
         mitigated through an extra level of method call but this is 
         inefficient.
 
+
 Proposed Syntax
  
     Special methods should declare themselves with declarations of the
@@ -105,7 +111,8 @@
     x.foo=fooval+5
     del x.foo
 
- Semantics
+
+Semantics
  
      Attribute references of all three kinds should call the method.
      The op parameter can be "get"/"set"/"del". Of course this string
@@ -125,6 +132,7 @@
      opposite choice seems fairly feasible also, however. The same
      goes for __del_y__.
 
+
 Proposed Implementation
  
     There is a new object type called an attribute access handler. 
@@ -169,6 +177,7 @@
     The implementation of delete is analogous to the implementation
     of set.
 
+
 Caveats
 
     1. You might note that I have not proposed any logic to keep
@@ -199,6 +208,8 @@
         on the object itself can cause an infinite loop (as with __getattr__)
         Once again, the solution is to use a special (typically private) 
         variable such as __XXX.
+
+
 
 Local Variables:
 mode: indented-text

-- 
Repository URL: http://hg.python.org/peps


More information about the Python-checkins mailing list