[Python-checkins] peps: remove mystery R & B columns

georg.brandl python-checkins at python.org
Wed Mar 23 21:26:43 CET 2011


http://hg.python.org/peps/rev/dee33e35fa8e
changeset:   146:dee33e35fa8e
user:        Jeremy Hylton <jeremy at alum.mit.edu>
date:        Wed Aug 23 14:34:25 2000 +0000
summary:
  remove mystery R & B columns

files:
  pep-0200.txt |  26 ++++++++++++--------------
  1 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)


diff --git a/pep-0200.txt b/pep-0200.txt
--- a/pep-0200.txt
+++ b/pep-0200.txt
@@ -86,18 +86,16 @@
     anyway, but that's another matter.)  If the test cases are known
     to fail, they serve no useful purpose.
 
-    [what are the "R" and "B" columns supposed to mean? - tim]
-
-    test case         platform   R B    date reported
-    ---------         --------   - -    -------------
-    test_parser       Windows    ? ?    22-Aug-2000
+    test case         platform    date reported
+    ---------         --------    -------------
+    test_parser       Windows     22-Aug-2000
         [probably all platforms]
 
-    test_posixpath    Windows    ? ?    22-Aug-2000
+    test_posixpath    Windows     22-Aug-2000
         [probably all platforms; think it's because Skip backed out
          commonpathprefix changes but didn't change the tests]
 
-    test_fork1        Linux      X      26-Jul-2000     just SMP?
+    test_fork1        Linux       26-Jul-2000 
         [no clue; there are probably two bugs here]
         [19-Aug-200 tim
          Charles Waldman whipped up a patch to give child processes a new
@@ -113,9 +111,9 @@
     If you find a test bouncing between this section and the previous one,
     the code it's testing is in trouble!
 
-    test case         platform   R B    date reported
-    ---------         --------   - -    -------------
-    test_popen2       Win32      X X    26-Jul-2000
+    test case         platform    date reported
+    ---------         --------    -------------
+    test_popen2       Win32       26-Jul-2000
         [20-Aug-2000 tim
          changed the popen2.py _test function to use the "more" cmd
          when os.name == "nt".  This makes test_popen2 pass under
@@ -133,14 +131,14 @@
          the code.
         ]
 
-    test_winreg        Win32     X X    26-Jul-2000
+    test_winreg        Win32      26-Jul-2000
         [works 15-Aug-2000 for me, on Win98 - tim]
 
-    test_mmap          Win32     X X    26-Jul-2000
+    test_mmap          Win32      26-Jul-2000
         [believe that was fixed by Mark H.]
         [works 15-Aug-2000 for me, on Win98 - tim]
 
-    test_longexp      Win98+?    ? ?    15-Aug-2000
+    test_longexp      Win98+?     15-Aug-2000
         [fails in release build,
          passes in release build under verbose mode but doesn't
              look like it should pass,
@@ -161,7 +159,7 @@
          in some cases where the test fails without -v
         ]
 
-    test_winreg2      Win32      X X    26-Jul-2000
+    test_winreg2      Win32       26-Jul-2000
         [20-Aug-2000 tim - the test has been removed from the project]
         [19-Aug-2000 tim
          This test will never work on Win98, because it's looking for

-- 
Repository URL: http://hg.python.org/peps


More information about the Python-checkins mailing list