[Python-checkins] peps: Fix some markup where the wrong text markup style was used for bold and italic.

[brett.cannon]

http://hg.python.org/peps/rev/4cc6738cfe3f
changeset:   4596:4cc6738cfe3f
user:        Brett Cannon <brett at python.org>
date:        Sun Dec 09 13:31:24 2012 -0500
summary:
  Fix some markup where the wrong text markup style was used for bold and italic.

files:
  pep-0399.txt |  6 +++---
  1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)


diff --git a/pep-0399.txt b/pep-0399.txt
--- a/pep-0399.txt
+++ b/pep-0399.txt
@@ -16,7 +16,7 @@
 The Python standard library under CPython contains various instances
 of modules implemented in both pure Python and C (either entirely or
 partially). This PEP requires that in these instances that the
-C code *must* pass the test suite used for the pure Python code
+C code **must** pass the test suite used for the pure Python code
 so as to act as much as a drop-in replacement as reasonably possible
 (C- and VM-specific tests are exempt). It is also required that new
 C-based modules lacking a pure Python equivalent implementation get
@@ -41,12 +41,12 @@
 Python or in the programming language used to implement the VM itself
 (e.g., in C# for IronPython). This duplication of effort between
 CPython, PyPy, Jython, and IronPython is extremely unfortunate as
-implementing a module *at least* in pure Python would help mitigate
+implementing a module **at least** in pure Python would help mitigate
 this duplicate effort.
 
 The purpose of this PEP is to minimize this duplicate effort by
 mandating that all new modules added to Python's standard library
-*must* have a pure Python implementation _unless_ special dispensation
+**must** have a pure Python implementation *unless* special dispensation
 is given. This makes sure that a module in the stdlib is available to
 all VMs and not just to CPython (pre-existing modules that do not meet
 this requirement are exempt, although there is nothing preventing

-- 
Repository URL: http://hg.python.org/peps