[Python-checkins] cpython: Add a note about pkgutil and how some things do not work in the face of PEP 302
brett.cannon
python-checkins at python.org
Mon Jul 9 20:15:39 CEST 2012
http://hg.python.org/cpython/rev/43f2ada6ee87
changeset: 78028:43f2ada6ee87
user: Brett Cannon <brett at python.org>
date: Mon Jul 09 14:15:32 2012 -0400
summary:
Add a note about pkgutil and how some things do not work in the face of PEP 302 permeating throughout import.
files:
Doc/whatsnew/3.3.rst | 8 +++++++-
1 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff --git a/Doc/whatsnew/3.3.rst b/Doc/whatsnew/3.3.rst
--- a/Doc/whatsnew/3.3.rst
+++ b/Doc/whatsnew/3.3.rst
@@ -1721,7 +1721,7 @@
* Because ``None`` is now inserted into :attr:`sys.path_importer_cache`, if you
are clearing out entries in the dictionary of paths that do not have a
finder, you will need to remove keys paired with values of ``None`` **and**
- :class:`imp.NullImporter` to be backwards-compatible. This will need to extra
+ :class:`imp.NullImporter` to be backwards-compatible. This will lead to extra
overhead on older versions of Python that re-insert ``None`` into
:attr:`sys.path_importer_cache` where it repesents the use of implicit
finders, but semantically it should not change anything.
@@ -1731,6 +1731,12 @@
both the modification time and size of the source file the bytecode file was
compiled from.
+* :func:`pkgutil.iter_modules` and :func:`pkgutil.walk_packages` no longer work
+ with modules imported using the default import system. Both functions have
+ always relied on a non-standard method (``iter_modules()``) to be defined on
+ loaders to work and the import system now always provides a loader for
+ modules but does not implement the non-standard method.
+
Porting C code
--------------
--
Repository URL: http://hg.python.org/cpython
More information about the Python-checkins
mailing list