[Python-checkins] peps: Reject PEP 315.
R. David Murray
rdmurray at bitdance.com
Wed Jun 26 18:18:08 CEST 2013
On Wed, 26 Jun 2013 17:39:07 +0200, lukasz.langa <python-checkins at python.org> wrote:
> - Deferred; see
> + Rejected; see
> + http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-ideas/2013-June/021610.html
> + This PEP has been deferred since 2006; see
> Subsequent efforts to revive the PEP in April 2009 did not
> meet with success because no syntax emerged that could
> - compete with a while-True and an inner if-break.
> + compete with the following form:
> - A syntax was found for a basic do-while loop but it found
> - had little support because the condition was at the top:
> + while True:
> + <setup code>
> + if not <condition>:
> + break
> + <loop body>
> - do ... while <cond>:
> - <loop body>
> + Users of the language are advised to use that form when a do-while
> + loop would have been appropriate.
Why delete the information about what was found wanting?
More information about the Python-checkins