[Python-checkins] [Python-Dev] peps: Reject PEP 315.

[Łukasz Langa]

On 27 cze 2013, at 00:51, Nick Coghlan <ncoghlan at gmail.com> wrote:
> On 27 Jun 2013 03:12, "Łukasz Langa" <lukasz at langa.pl> wrote:
> > This was a mention of an alternative possible syntax. I don't feel it was worth keeping this particular one while not discussing any other alternatives at all. If you'd rather keep this information, it would be better off to have it to an "Alternative approaches" section.
> 
> It was relevant because it was the most acceptable alternative found, and we *still* didn't think it was an improvement over the status quo.
> 
> We don't generally significantly edit PEPs when accepting or rejecting them.
> 


Comment restored, point taken. Thanks for clearing this up.


-- 
Best regards,
Łukasz Langa

WWW: http://lukasz.langa.pl/
Twitter: @llanga
IRC: ambv on #python-dev

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-checkins/attachments/20130627/5316fada/attachment.html>