[Python-checkins] peps: Remove "implicitly-raised" from abstract, it is just confusing.

guido.van.rossum python-checkins at python.org
Thu Nov 20 20:15:10 CET 2014

changeset:   5605:3cafc73b266a
user:        Guido van Rossum <guido at python.org>
date:        Thu Nov 20 11:14:58 2014 -0800
  Remove "implicitly-raised" from abstract, it is just confusing.

  pep-0479.txt |  2 +-
  1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)

diff --git a/pep-0479.txt b/pep-0479.txt
--- a/pep-0479.txt
+++ b/pep-0479.txt
@@ -19,7 +19,7 @@
 comprehensions and generator expressions, reducing surprises such as
 the one that started this discussion [1]_.  This is also the main
 backwards incompatibility of the proposal -- any generator that
-depends on an implicitly-raised ``StopIteration`` to terminate it will
+depends on raising ``StopIteration`` to terminate it will
 have to be rewritten to either catch that exception or use a for-loop.

Repository URL: https://hg.python.org/peps

More information about the Python-checkins mailing list