[Python-checkins] peps: Remove "implicitly-raised" from abstract, it is just confusing.
python-checkins at python.org
Thu Nov 20 20:15:10 CET 2014
user: Guido van Rossum <guido at python.org>
date: Thu Nov 20 11:14:58 2014 -0800
Remove "implicitly-raised" from abstract, it is just confusing.
pep-0479.txt | 2 +-
1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff --git a/pep-0479.txt b/pep-0479.txt
@@ -19,7 +19,7 @@
comprehensions and generator expressions, reducing surprises such as
the one that started this discussion _. This is also the main
backwards incompatibility of the proposal -- any generator that
-depends on an implicitly-raised ``StopIteration`` to terminate it will
+depends on raising ``StopIteration`` to terminate it will
have to be rewritten to either catch that exception or use a for-loop.
Repository URL: https://hg.python.org/peps
More information about the Python-checkins