[Python-checkins] peps: Fix typo. Revert my previous diff that removed another example breaking before

guido.van.rossum python-checkins at python.org
Fri Apr 15 12:54:49 EDT 2016


https://hg.python.org/peps/rev/c8554dfd4f22
changeset:   6284:c8554dfd4f22
user:        Guido van Rossum <guido at python.org>
date:        Fri Apr 15 09:54:42 2016 -0700
summary:
  Fix typo. Revert my previous diff that removed another example breaking before "and".

files:
  pep-0008.txt |  6 +++---
  1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)


diff --git a/pep-0008.txt b/pep-0008.txt
--- a/pep-0008.txt
+++ b/pep-0008.txt
@@ -147,8 +147,8 @@
         do_something()
 
     # Add some extra indentation on the conditional continuation line.
-    if (this_is_one_thing and
-            that_is_another_thing):
+    if (this_is_one_thing
+            and that_is_another_thing):
         do_something()
 
 (Also see the discussion of whether to break before or after binary
@@ -260,7 +260,7 @@
 after a binary operator, as long as the convention is consistent
 locally.  For new code Knuth's style is suggested.
 
-Some examples of code beaking before binary Boolean operators::
+Some examples of code breaking before binary Boolean operators::
 
     class Rectangle(Blob):
 

-- 
Repository URL: https://hg.python.org/peps


More information about the Python-checkins mailing list