[Python-checkins] cpython (merge 3.6 -> default): Merge from 3.6.
serhiy.storchaka
python-checkins at python.org
Wed Dec 14 12:57:15 EST 2016
https://hg.python.org/cpython/rev/09a8ee0f7585
changeset: 105623:09a8ee0f7585
parent: 105619:0350e0634a4b
parent: 105622:0ce789eae627
user: Serhiy Storchaka <storchaka at gmail.com>
date: Wed Dec 14 19:56:53 2016 +0200
summary:
Merge from 3.6.
files:
Lib/test/test_descr.py | 2 ++
Misc/NEWS | 3 ---
Objects/typeobject.c | 29 +----------------------------
3 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 31 deletions(-)
diff --git a/Lib/test/test_descr.py b/Lib/test/test_descr.py
--- a/Lib/test/test_descr.py
+++ b/Lib/test/test_descr.py
@@ -1662,6 +1662,7 @@
self.assertEqual(b.foo, 3)
self.assertEqual(b.__class__, D)
+ @unittest.expectedFailure
def test_bad_new(self):
self.assertRaises(TypeError, object.__new__)
self.assertRaises(TypeError, object.__new__, '')
@@ -1708,6 +1709,7 @@
object.__init__(A(3))
self.assertRaises(TypeError, object.__init__, A(3), 5)
+ @unittest.expectedFailure
def test_restored_object_new(self):
class A(object):
def __new__(cls, *args, **kwargs):
diff --git a/Misc/NEWS b/Misc/NEWS
--- a/Misc/NEWS
+++ b/Misc/NEWS
@@ -19,9 +19,6 @@
- Issue #28918: Fix the cross compilation of xxlimited when Python has been
built with Py_DEBUG defined.
-- Issue #5322: Fixed setting __new__ to a PyCFunction inside Python code.
- Original patch by Andreas Stührk.
-
- Issue #23722: Rather than silently producing a class that doesn't support
zero-argument ``super()`` in methods, failing to pass the new
``__classcell__`` namespace entry up to ``type.__new__`` now results in a
diff --git a/Objects/typeobject.c b/Objects/typeobject.c
--- a/Objects/typeobject.c
+++ b/Objects/typeobject.c
@@ -6847,34 +6847,7 @@
sanity checks and constructing a new argument
list. Cut all that nonsense short -- this speeds
up instance creation tremendously. */
- PyObject *self = PyCFunction_GET_SELF(descr);
- if (!self || !PyType_Check(self)) {
- /* This should never happen because
- tp_new_wrapper expects a type for self.
- Use slot_tp_new which will call
- tp_new_wrapper which will raise an
- exception. */
- specific = (void *)slot_tp_new;
- }
- else {
- PyTypeObject *staticbase;
- specific = ((PyTypeObject *)self)->tp_new;
- /* Check that the user does not do anything
- silly and unsafe like object.__new__(dict).
- To do this, we check that the most derived
- base that's not a heap type is this type. */
- staticbase = type->tp_base;
- while (staticbase &&
- (staticbase->tp_flags & Py_TPFLAGS_HEAPTYPE))
- staticbase = staticbase->tp_base;
- if (staticbase &&
- staticbase->tp_new != specific)
- /* Seems to be unsafe, better use
- slot_tp_new which will call
- tp_new_wrapper which will raise an
- exception if it is unsafe. */
- specific = (void *)slot_tp_new;
- }
+ specific = (void *)type->tp_new;
/* XXX I'm not 100% sure that there isn't a hole
in this reasoning that requires additional
sanity checks. I'll buy the first person to
--
Repository URL: https://hg.python.org/cpython
More information about the Python-checkins
mailing list