[Python-checkins] fix two typos in Objects/odictobject.c comments (GH-8040)

[Miss Islington (bot)]

https://github.com/python/cpython/commit/e544d65aae974bc5d094c5d3224373f5a59b16f1
commit: e544d65aae974bc5d094c5d3224373f5a59b16f1
branch: 3.6
author: Miss Islington (bot) <31488909+miss-islington at users.noreply.github.com>
committer: GitHub <noreply at github.com>
date: 2018-07-06T05:08:43-07:00
summary:

fix two typos in Objects/odictobject.c comments (GH-8040)

(cherry picked from commit 6f19fc6d5607040ee36153a64a2ed004582af91f)

Co-authored-by: Robert Krzyzanowski <technoguyrob at gmail.com>

files:
M Objects/odictobject.c

diff --git a/Objects/odictobject.c b/Objects/odictobject.c
index 65f90e83434e..26f15794418b 100644
--- a/Objects/odictobject.c
+++ b/Objects/odictobject.c
@@ -67,7 +67,7 @@ Linked-List API
 As noted, the linked-list implemented here does not have all the bells and
 whistles.  However, we recognize that the implementation may need to
 change to accommodate performance improvements or extra functionality.  To
-that end, We use a simple API to interact with the linked-list.  Here's a
+that end, we use a simple API to interact with the linked-list.  Here's a
 summary of the methods/macros:
 
 Node info:
@@ -444,7 +444,7 @@ Potential Optimizations
   - Set node->key to NULL to indicate the node is not-in-use.
   - Add _odict_EXISTS()?
   - How to maintain consistency across resizes?  Existing node pointers
-    would be invalidate after a resize, which is particularly problematic
+    would be invalidated after a resize, which is particularly problematic
     for the iterators.
 * Use a more stream-lined implementation of update() and, likely indirectly,
   __init__().