From tjreedy at udel.edu  Mon Aug  1 00:35:05 2011
From: tjreedy at udel.edu (Terry Reedy)
Date: Sun, 31 Jul 2011 22:35:05 -0000
Subject: [python-committers] Committer rights for Sandro Tosi
In-Reply-To: <4E35886C.8060701@gmail.com>
References: <4E35886C.8060701@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <3A5009D0.8090105@udel.edu>



On 7/31/2011 12:53 PM, Ezio Melotti wrote:

> I would like to have Sandro added to the list of committers.

Good.

> He has been very active on the bug tracker, doing triaging work and
> contributing a number of patches.

After noticing his activity, I believe I counted over 30 patch 
submissions with commits by about 7 different people (including Ezio). I 
was about to ask if any of them thought he should be added.

So I am a qualified +1 on the basis of volume of activity without having 
been directly involved with his work.

Terry


From rdmurray at bitdance.com  Mon Aug  1 16:00:45 2011
From: rdmurray at bitdance.com (R. David Murray)
Date: Mon, 01 Aug 2011 10:00:45 -0400
Subject: [python-committers] Committer rights for Sandro Tosi
In-Reply-To: <4E35886C.8060701@gmail.com>
References: <4E35886C.8060701@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <20110801140045.E74A12506C6@webabinitio.net>

On Sun, 31 Jul 2011 19:53:00 +0300, Ezio Melotti <ezio.melotti at gmail.com> wrote:
> I would like to have Sandro added to the list of committers.
> He has been very active on the bug tracker, doing triaging work and 
> contributing a number of patches.
> He also reported more than 40 issues, mainly about the documentation, 
> and most of them have been fixed.

Given Sandro's level of activity and the (at least for the ones I've
looked at, which granted haven't been many) accuracy of his doc patches,
I think he would be a valuable to have as a committer.  From my
interactions with him I don't think we need to have any worry about
his going crazy with code commits...he's very aware of the need
to be conservative and get reviews.

Ezio, are you volunteering to be his mentor?  If so, then definitely +1.

--
R. David Murray           http://www.bitdance.com

From merwok at netwok.org  Mon Aug  1 16:03:51 2011
From: merwok at netwok.org (=?UTF-8?B?w4lyaWMgQXJhdWpv?=)
Date: Mon, 01 Aug 2011 16:03:51 +0200
Subject: [python-committers] Committer rights for Sandro Tosi
In-Reply-To: <4E35886C.8060701@gmail.com>
References: <4E35886C.8060701@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <4E36B247.2070400@netwok.org>

Hi,

> I would like to have Sandro added to the list of committers.
> He has been very active on the bug tracker, doing triaging work and 
> contributing a number of patches.
I?ve read, reviewed and sometimes committed a number of his patches.  +1
for push permissions.  I volunteer to mentor him if Ezio can?t or
doesn?t want to.

> He also reported more than 40 issues, mainly about the documentation, 
> and most of them have been fixed.
He?s actually been acting as the curator of docs at python for some months
and forwarding bugs to the tracker.

Cheers

From brian.curtin at gmail.com  Mon Aug  1 16:04:59 2011
From: brian.curtin at gmail.com (Brian Curtin)
Date: Mon, 1 Aug 2011 09:04:59 -0500
Subject: [python-committers] Committer rights for Sandro Tosi
In-Reply-To: <20110801140045.E74A12506C6@webabinitio.net>
References: <4E35886C.8060701@gmail.com>
	<20110801140045.E74A12506C6@webabinitio.net>
Message-ID: <CAD+XWwrO4NanM=GYgVt+DNqccB+onnc+M1j27FfHxW8KPdNDwg@mail.gmail.com>

On Mon, Aug 1, 2011 at 09:00, R. David Murray <rdmurray at bitdance.com> wrote:

> On Sun, 31 Jul 2011 19:53:00 +0300, Ezio Melotti <ezio.melotti at gmail.com>
> wrote:
> > I would like to have Sandro added to the list of committers.
> > He has been very active on the bug tracker, doing triaging work and
> > contributing a number of patches.
> > He also reported more than 40 issues, mainly about the documentation,
> > and most of them have been fixed.
>
> Given Sandro's level of activity and the (at least for the ones I've
> looked at, which granted haven't been many) accuracy of his doc patches,
> I think he would be a valuable to have as a committer.  From my
> interactions with him I don't think we need to have any worry about
> his going crazy with code commits...he's very aware of the need
> to be conservative and get reviews.
>
> Ezio, are you volunteering to be his mentor?  If so, then definitely +1.


I haven't had much time to spend around python-dev lately, but my
interactions with him on the tracker and IRC have been easy going and he has
done good work, so I say +1 as well.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-committers/attachments/20110801/b5a02b5d/attachment.html>

From ezio.melotti at gmail.com  Mon Aug  1 16:14:57 2011
From: ezio.melotti at gmail.com (Ezio Melotti)
Date: Mon, 01 Aug 2011 17:14:57 +0300
Subject: [python-committers] Committer rights for Sandro Tosi
In-Reply-To: <20110801140045.E74A12506C6@webabinitio.net>
References: <4E35886C.8060701@gmail.com>
	<20110801140045.E74A12506C6@webabinitio.net>
Message-ID: <4E36B4E1.9080008@gmail.com>

On 01/08/2011 17.00, R. David Murray wrote:
> On Sun, 31 Jul 2011 19:53:00 +0300, Ezio Melotti<ezio.melotti at gmail.com>  wrote:
>> I would like to have Sandro added to the list of committers.
>> He has been very active on the bug tracker, doing triaging work and
>> contributing a number of patches.
>> He also reported more than 40 issues, mainly about the documentation,
>> and most of them have been fixed.
> Given Sandro's level of activity and the (at least for the ones I've
> looked at, which granted haven't been many) accuracy of his doc patches,
> I think he would be a valuable to have as a committer.  From my
> interactions with him I don't think we need to have any worry about
> his going crazy with code commits...he's very aware of the need
> to be conservative and get reviews.
>
> Ezio, are you volunteering to be his mentor?  If so, then definitely +1.

Sure.

Best Regards,
Ezio Melotti

>
> --
> R. David Murray           http://www.bitdance.com
>


From solipsis at pitrou.net  Mon Aug  1 16:56:43 2011
From: solipsis at pitrou.net (Antoine Pitrou)
Date: Mon, 01 Aug 2011 16:56:43 +0200
Subject: [python-committers] Committer rights for Sandro Tosi
In-Reply-To: <4E36B247.2070400@netwok.org>
References: <4E35886C.8060701@gmail.com>  <4E36B247.2070400@netwok.org>
Message-ID: <1312210603.3575.7.camel@localhost.localdomain>


Sandro has also contributed a couple of tests improvements.
+1 from me.

Regards

Antoine.


Le lundi 01 ao?t 2011 ? 16:03 +0200, ?ric Araujo a ?crit :
> Hi,
> 
> > I would like to have Sandro added to the list of committers.
> > He has been very active on the bug tracker, doing triaging work and 
> > contributing a number of patches.
> I?ve read, reviewed and sometimes committed a number of his patches.  +1
> for push permissions.  I volunteer to mentor him if Ezio can?t or
> doesn?t want to.
> 
> > He also reported more than 40 issues, mainly about the documentation, 
> > and most of them have been fixed.
> He?s actually been acting as the curator of docs at python for some months
> and forwarding bugs to the tracker.
> 
> Cheers
> _______________________________________________
> python-committers mailing list
> python-committers at python.org
> http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-committers



From brett at python.org  Mon Aug  1 20:10:15 2011
From: brett at python.org (Brett Cannon)
Date: Mon, 1 Aug 2011 11:10:15 -0700
Subject: [python-committers] Committer rights for Sandro Tosi
In-Reply-To: <1312210603.3575.7.camel@localhost.localdomain>
References: <4E35886C.8060701@gmail.com> <4E36B247.2070400@netwok.org>
	<1312210603.3575.7.camel@localhost.localdomain>
Message-ID: <CAP1=2W4T_DMOkmyuwDrO2STFQ4UmZjJvD4=RQ8nq6ki54HRgGw@mail.gmail.com>

I have also interacted with him and been happy with the outcome, so +1 from
me as well.

That seems to be enough people who support this, so if Ezio or Eric could
point Sandro to the devguide entry on requesting commit privs, and decide if
one or both of you will mentor him, we can get him up and going.

On Mon, Aug 1, 2011 at 07:56, Antoine Pitrou <solipsis at pitrou.net> wrote:

>
> Sandro has also contributed a couple of tests improvements.
> +1 from me.
>
> Regards
>
> Antoine.
>
>
> Le lundi 01 ao?t 2011 ? 16:03 +0200, ?ric Araujo a ?crit :
> > Hi,
> >
> > > I would like to have Sandro added to the list of committers.
> > > He has been very active on the bug tracker, doing triaging work and
> > > contributing a number of patches.
> > I?ve read, reviewed and sometimes committed a number of his patches.  +1
> > for push permissions.  I volunteer to mentor him if Ezio can?t or
> > doesn?t want to.
> >
> > > He also reported more than 40 issues, mainly about the documentation,
> > > and most of them have been fixed.
> > He?s actually been acting as the curator of docs at python for some months
> > and forwarding bugs to the tracker.
> >
> > Cheers
> > _______________________________________________
> > python-committers mailing list
> > python-committers at python.org
> > http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-committers
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> python-committers mailing list
> python-committers at python.org
> http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-committers
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-committers/attachments/20110801/0f0d74f5/attachment-0001.html>

From senthil at uthcode.com  Tue Aug  2 12:46:55 2011
From: senthil at uthcode.com (Senthil Kumaran)
Date: Tue, 2 Aug 2011 18:46:55 +0800
Subject: [python-committers] Committer rights for Sandro Tosi
In-Reply-To: <CAP1=2W4T_DMOkmyuwDrO2STFQ4UmZjJvD4=RQ8nq6ki54HRgGw@mail.gmail.com>
References: <4E35886C.8060701@gmail.com> <4E36B247.2070400@netwok.org>
	<1312210603.3575.7.camel@localhost.localdomain>
	<CAP1=2W4T_DMOkmyuwDrO2STFQ4UmZjJvD4=RQ8nq6ki54HRgGw@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <20110802104655.GA2785@mathmagic>

+1 from me as well. 

It would be good to request new committers to write an introductory
mail about themselves.

Thanks,
Senthil

On Mon, Aug 01, 2011 at 11:10:15AM -0700, Brett Cannon wrote:
> I have also interacted with him and been happy with the outcome, so +1 from me
> as well.
> 
> That seems to be enough people who support this, so if Ezio or Eric could point
> Sandro to the devguide entry on requesting commit privs, and decide if one or
> both of you will mentor him, we can get him up and going.
> 
> On Mon, Aug 1, 2011 at 07:56, Antoine Pitrou <solipsis at pitrou.net> wrote:
> 
> 
>     Sandro has also contributed a couple of tests improvements.
>     +1 from me.
> 
>     Regards
> 
>     Antoine.
> 
> 
>     Le lundi 01 ao?t 2011 ? 16:03 +0200, ?ric Araujo a ?crit :
>     > Hi,
>     >
>     > > I would like to have Sandro added to the list of committers.
>     > > He has been very active on the bug tracker, doing triaging work and
>     > > contributing a number of patches.
>     > I?ve read, reviewed and sometimes committed a number of his patches. ?+1
>     > for push permissions. ?I volunteer to mentor him if Ezio can?t or
>     > doesn?t want to.
>     >
>     > > He also reported more than 40 issues, mainly about the documentation,
>     > > and most of them have been fixed.
>     > He?s actually been acting as the curator of docs at python for some months
>     > and forwarding bugs to the tracker.
>     >
>     > Cheers
>     > _______________________________________________
>     > python-committers mailing list
>     > python-committers at python.org
>     > http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-committers
> 
> 
>     _______________________________________________
>     python-committers mailing list
>     python-committers at python.org
>     http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-committers
> 
> 

> _______________________________________________
> python-committers mailing list
> python-committers at python.org
> http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-committers


From patcam at python.org  Wed Aug  3 02:29:48 2011
From: patcam at python.org (Pat Campbell)
Date: Tue, 2 Aug 2011 20:29:48 -0400
Subject: [python-committers] Committer rights for Sandro Tosi
In-Reply-To: <4E35886C.8060701@gmail.com>
References: <4E35886C.8060701@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <CAFy_4dKHF4m0qUfc-T8vZTNWgO6muzgwf=Guyub7RMJnC2bk8Q@mail.gmail.com>

Hi Ezio:

Okay, and yes, please have Sandro submit a contributor agreement.

Thanks,
Pat

On Sun, Jul 31, 2011 at 12:53 PM, Ezio Melotti <ezio.melotti at gmail.com>wrote:

> Hi,
> I would like to have Sandro added to the list of committers.
> He has been very active on the bug tracker, doing triaging work and
> contributing a number of patches.
> He also reported more than 40 issues, mainly about the documentation, and
> most of them have been fixed.
>
> He hasn't submitted the contributor agreement yet but he will do it as soon
> as he finds a printer/scanner/camera/fax.
>
> Best Regards,
> Ezio Melotti
> ______________________________**_________________
> python-committers mailing list
> python-committers at python.org
> http://mail.python.org/**mailman/listinfo/python-**committers<http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-committers>
>



-- 
Pat Campbell
PSF Administrator/Secretary
patcam at python.org
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-committers/attachments/20110802/eb1894f7/attachment.html>

From ezio.melotti at gmail.com  Wed Aug  3 12:34:29 2011
From: ezio.melotti at gmail.com (Ezio Melotti)
Date: Wed, 03 Aug 2011 13:34:29 +0300
Subject: [python-committers] Committer rights for Sandro Tosi
In-Reply-To: <CAFy_4dKHF4m0qUfc-T8vZTNWgO6muzgwf=Guyub7RMJnC2bk8Q@mail.gmail.com>
References: <4E35886C.8060701@gmail.com>
	<CAFy_4dKHF4m0qUfc-T8vZTNWgO6muzgwf=Guyub7RMJnC2bk8Q@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <4E392435.4030708@gmail.com>

Hi,

On 03/08/2011 3.29, Pat Campbell wrote:
> Hi Ezio:
>
> Okay, and yes, please have Sandro submit a contributor agreement.

He should have sent it already yesterday morning, via fax.

Best Regards,
Ezio Melotti

>
> Thanks,
> Pat
>


From patcam at python.org  Wed Aug  3 20:27:34 2011
From: patcam at python.org (Pat Campbell)
Date: Wed, 3 Aug 2011 14:27:34 -0400
Subject: [python-committers] Committer rights for Sandro Tosi
In-Reply-To: <CAPdtAj2qm5ADXzwVz7hyFEiaFTa9_+tj-0B6n85h9WVuFzdX-g@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAPdtAj2qm5ADXzwVz7hyFEiaFTa9_+tj-0B6n85h9WVuFzdX-g@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <CAFy_4dJwk-JRz0sN=+b_r-b_xbsPQpf=9oLqY6MXeHtOeMrT=w@mail.gmail.com>

Hi Sandro:

I have received your contributor agreement via fax. Thanks for submitting
it.

Pat

On Wed, Aug 3, 2011 at 4:34 AM, Sandro Tosi <sandro.tosi at gmail.com> wrote:

> Hi Pat,
> I sent the CA via fax yesterday morning (CEST time) - the result was
> 'ok', so can you confirm it's also received correctly on the other
> end?
>
> Cheers,
> --
> Sandro Tosi (aka morph, morpheus, matrixhasu)
> My website: http://matrixhasu.altervista.org/
> Me at Debian: http://wiki.debian.org/SandroTosi
>



-- 
Pat Campbell
PSF Administrator/Secretary
patcam at python.org
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-committers/attachments/20110803/755a29fa/attachment.html>

From patcam at python.org  Wed Aug  3 20:46:25 2011
From: patcam at python.org (Pat Campbell)
Date: Wed, 3 Aug 2011 14:46:25 -0400
Subject: [python-committers] Committer rights for Sandro Tosi
In-Reply-To: <4E392435.4030708@gmail.com>
References: <4E35886C.8060701@gmail.com>
	<CAFy_4dKHF4m0qUfc-T8vZTNWgO6muzgwf=Guyub7RMJnC2bk8Q@mail.gmail.com>
	<4E392435.4030708@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <CAFy_4dJpPs=NKWvYgbNBKVxB=4km-s3rf1pkdiaRy26ok+0TaA@mail.gmail.com>

Thanks Ezio. Yes, I have received it.

Pat

On Wed, Aug 3, 2011 at 6:34 AM, Ezio Melotti <ezio.melotti at gmail.com> wrote:

> Hi,
>
>
> On 03/08/2011 3.29, Pat Campbell wrote:
>
>> Hi Ezio:
>>
>> Okay, and yes, please have Sandro submit a contributor agreement.
>>
>
> He should have sent it already yesterday morning, via fax.
>
> Best Regards,
> Ezio Melotti
>
>
>> Thanks,
>> Pat
>>
>>
>


-- 
Pat Campbell
PSF Administrator/Secretary
patcam at python.org
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-committers/attachments/20110803/42e42771/attachment.html>

From brian.curtin at gmail.com  Tue Aug  9 23:22:24 2011
From: brian.curtin at gmail.com (Brian Curtin)
Date: Tue, 9 Aug 2011 16:22:24 -0500
Subject: [python-committers] Expiring MSDN Subscriptions
Message-ID: <CAD+XWwp2hCp8WqKVxb1HJX5Mjo-ybLjZpRMmAR7KpmSc4g4+3w@mail.gmail.com>

We have a group of devs who received MSDN subscriptions around this time
last year which are now expired or about to expire. If yours is expired,
which you can find from
https://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/subscriptions/manage/default.aspx, send me
your subscriber ID and the email address tied to your account and I'll get
it renewed for another year. The renewal takes roughly a week to process,
and I'd like to send the fewest emails to the fine folks at Microsoft's Open
Source Technology Center, so please respond soon so I can send out a batch.

If you don't currently have a subscription but would be interested in one,
let me know off-list and I'll gather some info from you and get you setup.
The main benefits are access to the full versions of Visual Studio and every
version of Windows. You also get access to what seems like anything
Microsoft has released, so you can relive Windows 3.1 if you want.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-committers/attachments/20110809/15e3d6c8/attachment.html>

From brian.curtin at gmail.com  Thu Aug 11 18:02:16 2011
From: brian.curtin at gmail.com (Brian Curtin)
Date: Thu, 11 Aug 2011 11:02:16 -0500
Subject: [python-committers] Expiring MSDN Subscriptions
In-Reply-To: <CAD+XWwp2hCp8WqKVxb1HJX5Mjo-ybLjZpRMmAR7KpmSc4g4+3w@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAD+XWwp2hCp8WqKVxb1HJX5Mjo-ybLjZpRMmAR7KpmSc4g4+3w@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <CAD+XWwpUM_kQnt8hurM5Si=tWc14r+3q5-M8zqtUURbjbKU_EQ@mail.gmail.com>

On Tue, Aug 9, 2011 at 16:22, Brian Curtin <brian.curtin at gmail.com> wrote:

> We have a group of devs who received MSDN subscriptions around this time
> last year which are now expired or about to expire. If yours is expired,
> which you can find from
> https://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/subscriptions/manage/default.aspx, send
> me your subscriber ID and the email address tied to your account and I'll
> get it renewed for another year. The renewal takes roughly a week to
> process, and I'd like to send the fewest emails to the fine folks at
> Microsoft's Open Source Technology Center, so please respond soon so I can
> send out a batch.
>
> If you don't currently have a subscription but would be interested in one,
> let me know off-list and I'll gather some info from you and get you setup.
> The main benefits are access to the full versions of Visual Studio and every
> version of Windows. You also get access to what seems like anything
> Microsoft has released, so you can relive Windows 3.1 if you want.
>

I just submitted a batch of renewals and first-time subscriptions for all
who responded so far. If anyone else wants a renewal or first-time
subscription, feel free to email me directly and I'll get it taken care of.

Be on the lookout for mails from msdntnorders at arvatousa.com which is the
order confirmation, and then one from Msubserv at microsoft.com with activation
details.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-committers/attachments/20110811/5e646f2c/attachment.html>

From g.brandl at gmx.net  Sat Aug 13 11:26:38 2011
From: g.brandl at gmx.net (Georg Brandl)
Date: Sat, 13 Aug 2011 11:26:38 +0200
Subject: [python-committers] Working on 3.2.2rc1
Message-ID: <j25g0a$5id$1@dough.gmane.org>

I've created another release clone for 3.2.2rc1 and am working on
that release now.

There are consistent failures in test_distutils on the Windows
machines; it would be nice to get these fixed.  If anyone can do
that in the next few hours, please tell me on #python-dev, otherwise
it'll have to wait for the final.

Georg


From patcam at python.org  Tue Aug 16 22:17:15 2011
From: patcam at python.org (Pat Campbell)
Date: Tue, 16 Aug 2011 16:17:15 -0400
Subject: [python-committers] [PSF-Board] Contributor Agreement
In-Reply-To: <CALq5fJLhkAC-85cfhOXWVyTYe6itXPZM8AV0oWgC=a3b4iEmdw@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CALq5fJLhkAC-85cfhOXWVyTYe6itXPZM8AV0oWgC=a3b4iEmdw@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <CAFy_4d+GED1MueeFTC0E2EyQb8=UWgJ0Difp3DcuBVtC6b8CnQ@mail.gmail.com>

Hi Ben:

Thank-you for submitting your contributor agreement. Your information has
been
added to the PSF tracker system.

Thanks,
Pat

On Mon, Aug 15, 2011 at 1:49 PM, Ben Hayden <hayden767 at gmail.com> wrote:

> [image: signedform.jpg]
>
>
> Above is the contributor agreement. I haven't made a ton of contributions,
> but have submitted a code patch & a documentation patch. My username is
> beardedp, http://bugs.python.org/user13432.
>
> _______________________________________________
> PSF-Board mailing list
> PSF-Board at python.org
> http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/psf-board
>
>


-- 
Pat Campbell
PSF Administrator/Secretary
patcam at python.org
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-committers/attachments/20110816/6f0b46d7/attachment-0001.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signedform.jpg
Type: image/jpeg
Size: 96685 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-committers/attachments/20110816/6f0b46d7/attachment-0001.jpg>

From patcam at python.org  Wed Aug 17 20:46:08 2011
From: patcam at python.org (Pat Campbell)
Date: Wed, 17 Aug 2011 14:46:08 -0400
Subject: [python-committers] [PSF-Board] Contributor Agreement
In-Reply-To: <4E4AE890.9080300@udel.edu>
References: <CALq5fJLhkAC-85cfhOXWVyTYe6itXPZM8AV0oWgC=a3b4iEmdw@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAFy_4d+GED1MueeFTC0E2EyQb8=UWgJ0Difp3DcuBVtC6b8CnQ@mail.gmail.com>
	<4E4AE890.9080300@udel.edu>
Message-ID: <CAFy_4d+ojq21MH6--VbtXmY5nak9Kdsc06b0hFPyAG841JSuEw@mail.gmail.com>

Hi Terry:

Thanks for submitting your contributor agreement. Our records show that
your contributor agreement is "now" :) listed on the PSF tracker system.

Pat

On Tue, Aug 16, 2011 at 6:00 PM, Terry Reedy <tjreedy at udel.edu> wrote:

> Since, last I looked, the tracker does not have me listed as having
> submitted a contributor agreement, I presume mine was one of those on paper
> that got lost. If so, and in any case, here is a digital replacement.
>



-- 
Pat Campbell
PSF Administrator/Secretary
patcam at python.org
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-committers/attachments/20110817/5be84dbc/attachment.html>

From patcam at python.org  Fri Aug 19 01:06:03 2011
From: patcam at python.org (Pat Campbell)
Date: Thu, 18 Aug 2011 19:06:03 -0400
Subject: [python-committers] [PSF-Board] Contribution form
In-Reply-To: <4E4D48D1.70404@notmyidea.org>
References: <4E4D48D1.70404@notmyidea.org>
Message-ID: <CAFy_4d+FQCMYsp_+5hb3NhofjF41b0Qd3YLotofZLcUu_UZx5g@mail.gmail.com>

Hi Alexis:

Thank-you for submitting your contributor agreement. The
PSF tracker has been updated.

Pat

2011/8/18 Alexis M?taireau <alexis at notmyidea.org>

> Hi,
>
> Here is my PSF contribution form (attached), thanks.
> My name on the bug tracker is "alexis".
>
> --
> Alexis
>
> _______________________________________________
> PSF-Board mailing list
> PSF-Board at python.org
> http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/psf-board
>
>


-- 
Pat Campbell
PSF Administrator/Secretary
patcam at python.org
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-committers/attachments/20110818/9873e022/attachment.html>

From g.brandl at gmx.net  Tue Aug 30 22:03:52 2011
From: g.brandl at gmx.net (Georg Brandl)
Date: Tue, 30 Aug 2011 22:03:52 +0200
Subject: [python-committers] 3.2.2 delayed
Message-ID: <j3jfko$m68$1@dough.gmane.org>

Due to other deadlines, I have to delay 3.2.2 final to the coming
weekend.  Nothing much changes for most of you, just if you were
wondering...

Georg


From merwok at netwok.org  Wed Aug 31 16:39:05 2011
From: merwok at netwok.org (=?UTF-8?B?w4lyaWMgQXJhdWpv?=)
Date: Wed, 31 Aug 2011 16:39:05 +0200
Subject: [python-committers] Three wishes for Mercurial-Roundup integration
Message-ID: <4E5E4789.8060001@netwok.org>

Hi,

1) When a commit message references more than one bug (with text
matching #\d+), only the first gets a message for the changeset.  I
would like all referenced bugs to get a message.

2) When a bug number (#\d+) is not in the first line of the commit
message, no message is sent.  Is there a reason for this or is it a bug?
 (Note: I?m not sure about this one, I may misremember.)

3) To let us track the backport of changesets from cpython/packaging to
distutils2, I would like the script to look at changesets in the
distutils2 repo and send messages to Roundup when a bug number is detected.

Thanks in advance

From merwok at netwok.org  Wed Aug 31 17:46:34 2011
From: merwok at netwok.org (=?UTF-8?B?w4lyaWMgQXJhdWpv?=)
Date: Wed, 31 Aug 2011 17:46:34 +0200
Subject: [python-committers] Three wishes for Mercurial-Roundup
	integration
In-Reply-To: <4E5E4789.8060001@netwok.org>
References: <4E5E4789.8060001@netwok.org>
Message-ID: <4E5E575A.2010106@netwok.org>

Ezio prompted me to clarify something: I?m asking for votes more than
code with my message.  I can probably change/fix 2) and 3) myself, but
I?d like feedback for 1).

From tjreedy at udel.edu  Wed Aug 31 19:34:43 2011
From: tjreedy at udel.edu (Terry Reedy)
Date: Wed, 31 Aug 2011 13:34:43 -0400
Subject: [python-committers] Three wishes for Mercurial-Roundup
	integration
In-Reply-To: <4E5E4789.8060001@netwok.org>
References: <4E5E4789.8060001@netwok.org>
Message-ID: <4E5E70B3.50803@udel.edu>

On 8/31/2011 10:39 AM, ?ric Araujo wrote:

> 1) When a commit message references more than one bug (with text
> matching #\d+), only the first gets a message for the changeset.  I
> would like all referenced bugs to get a message.

+1 I would have expected this to be the case already. While there is 
something to be said for one issue -- one patch, there are legitimate 
exceptions. It is possible for two different surface level behavior bugs 
to be fixed by one underlying code patch. Also, I would prefer one patch 
for multiple typos fixed at the same time.
>
> 2) When a bug number (#\d+) is not in the first line of the commit
> message, no message is sent.  Is there a reason for this or is it a bug?
>   (Note: I?m not sure about this one, I may misremember.)

+1 I would have expected this also. While it is usually a good idea to 
put the issue number in the first line, I see this as a social issue 
rather than a technical issue. If an issue numbers on later lines is 
regarded as an error, then the technical fix would be to reject the 
patch with a message to the submitter. 'Errors should not pass silently'.

> 3) To let us track the backport of changesets from
cpython/packaging to
> distutils2, I would like the script to look at changesets in the
> distutils2 repo and send messages to Roundup when a bug number is detected.

+1 This would also help bug submitters who are using disutils2 on 
pre-3.3 releases to know that the fix is available to them also.

---
Terry Jan Reedy


From ezio.melotti at gmail.com  Wed Aug 31 19:44:05 2011
From: ezio.melotti at gmail.com (Ezio Melotti)
Date: Wed, 31 Aug 2011 20:44:05 +0300
Subject: [python-committers] Three wishes for Mercurial-Roundup
	integration
In-Reply-To: <4E5E4789.8060001@netwok.org>
References: <4E5E4789.8060001@netwok.org>
Message-ID: <CACBhJdHDSR5HhQXqbB3Cz1fSy1__zvOZL63180vOmT2i0VSwmA@mail.gmail.com>

Hi,

On Wed, Aug 31, 2011 at 5:39 PM, ?ric Araujo <merwok at netwok.org> wrote:

> Hi,
>
> 1) When a commit message references more than one bug (with text
> matching #\d+), only the first gets a message for the changeset.  I
> would like all referenced bugs to get a message.
>

I'm -0 on this. Even if it shouldn't be too difficult to implement I'm not
sure it's worth doing it, since it's not something that happens often enough
and when it does you usually want to explain something more to the second
issue anyway.  Moreover fixes should be related to a single issue.


> 2) When a bug number (#\d+) is not in the first line of the commit
> message, no message is sent.  Is there a reason for this or is it a bug?
>  (Note: I?m not sure about this one, I may misremember.)
>
>
>From a quick look at the code I don't see any obvious reason why this
shouldn't work, if it really doesn't I guess it can be fixed.  (I prefer to
always write the issue number at beginning of the line though.)


> 3) To let us track the backport of changesets from cpython/packaging to
> distutils2, I would like the script to look at changesets in the
> distutils2 repo and send messages to Roundup when a bug number is detected.
>
>
It would be useful for the devguide repo too, now that we have a 'devguide'
component (and possibly for 'benchmarks' too, as you suggested on
#python-dev).


> Thanks in advance
>
>
Best Regards,
Ezio Melotti
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-committers/attachments/20110831/ecc1a277/attachment.html>

From g.brandl at gmx.net  Wed Aug 31 20:13:25 2011
From: g.brandl at gmx.net (Georg Brandl)
Date: Wed, 31 Aug 2011 20:13:25 +0200
Subject: [python-committers] Three wishes for Mercurial-Roundup
	integration
In-Reply-To: <4E5E4789.8060001@netwok.org>
References: <4E5E4789.8060001@netwok.org>
Message-ID: <j3lthk$ioc$1@dough.gmane.org>

Am 31.08.2011 16:39, schrieb ?ric Araujo:
> Hi,
> 
> 1) When a commit message references more than one bug (with text
> matching #\d+), only the first gets a message for the changeset.  I
> would like all referenced bugs to get a message.

+1.  Just make sure that only issues that should be closed are closed
(i.e. if the commit message is """Close #1234: better fix than proposed
in #5678""", #1234 should be closed, and #5678 get a reference).

> 2) When a bug number (#\d+) is not in the first line of the commit
> message, no message is sent.  Is there a reason for this or is it a bug?
>  (Note: I?m not sure about this one, I may misremember.)

I can't imagine why that would be.  So if it is indeed the case, it's a bug.

> 3) To let us track the backport of changesets from cpython/packaging to
> distutils2, I would like the script to look at changesets in the
> distutils2 repo and send messages to Roundup when a bug number is detected.

Sure.  Should be a simple [hooks] entry.

Georg