[python-committers] [PSF-Members] Code Simplicity » Open Source Community, Simplified

Jesus Cea jcea at jcea.es
Fri Feb 4 12:46:06 CET 2011


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On 04/02/11 11:19, M.-A. Lemburg wrote:
> I don't understand why the developers have to follow the tools and
> not the tools the developers.

Well, the tool is designed for a particular workflow. If you do
something else, you are fighting the tool and not taking advantage of
its bigger strenght.

I am advocating a particular workflow (reverse to current) because it is
"natural" to mercurial and I find it sensible. That said, the fact is
that current workflow can not be used comfy with current mercurial. That
is a shameful limitation, I do agree.

Some people is working in solving this limitations. But we have to
consider if using a "non natural" workflow would alienate new coders
familiar with "natural" mercurial workflow. Since one of the objectives
of HG migration is to ease external contributions, doing thing "the
right way" would help too.

- -- 
Jesus Cea Avion                         _/_/      _/_/_/        _/_/_/
jcea at jcea.es - http://www.jcea.es/     _/_/    _/_/  _/_/    _/_/  _/_/
jabber / xmpp:jcea at jabber.org         _/_/    _/_/          _/_/_/_/_/
.                              _/_/  _/_/    _/_/          _/_/  _/_/
"Things are not so easy"      _/_/  _/_/    _/_/  _/_/    _/_/  _/_/
"My name is Dump, Core Dump"   _/_/_/        _/_/_/      _/_/  _/_/
"El amor es poner tu felicidad en la felicidad de otro" - Leibniz
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/

iQCVAwUBTUvm/plgi5GaxT1NAQJwegP/f5N5PzUpwchEoh1ZeJGccuoGSVj7crTx
96hDNaQEcd9GG7V8IQ2+LXkjwF/HkCshkuyO2XMPFBVahzKOidlG5zEv4bAzDdvY
lpiqo70sJYJt7doTwTxQx4v9lbuqYD0gHiv+3Sw06887gqyR05YqCdhcm8NgoNFg
+YfLwmrwvu8=
=iIIh
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


More information about the python-committers mailing list