From patcam at python.org  Sun Nov  6 21:50:45 2011
From: patcam at python.org (Pat Campbell)
Date: Sun, 6 Nov 2011 15:50:45 -0500
Subject: [python-committers] PSF Contributor Agreement from John
	Feuerstein
In-Reply-To: <4EB6E7A1.1060409@feurix.com>
References: <4EB6E7A1.1060409@feurix.com>
Message-ID: <CAFy_4dJXomXaQHmfOqBw0RbgYBJ1pO+VZe1pXy9voSGo2CkyOw@mail.gmail.com>

Hi John:

Thank-you for submitting your contributor agreement.

Pat

On Sun, Nov 6, 2011 at 3:01 PM, John Feuerstein <john at feurix.com> wrote:

> Dear Secretary,
>
> please find my attached contributor agreement.
>
>
> Contributor:              John Feuerstein
> bugs.python.org username: john.feuerstein
> Address:                  Hintergasse 10
>                          61231 Bad Nauheim, Hesse, Germany
> Email:                    john at feurix.com
>
> Initial License:          Apache License, Version 2.0
>
>
> Kind regards,
> John Feuerstein
>



-- 
Pat Campbell
PSF Administrator/Secretary
patcam at python.org
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-committers/attachments/20111106/e9294ca0/attachment.html>

From ezio.melotti at gmail.com  Sun Nov 13 17:54:50 2011
From: ezio.melotti at gmail.com (Ezio Melotti)
Date: Sun, 13 Nov 2011 18:54:50 +0200
Subject: [python-committers] Three wishes for Mercurial-Roundup
	integration
In-Reply-To: <4E610A0A.7040407@netwok.org>
References: <4E5E4789.8060001@netwok.org> <j3lthk$ioc$1@dough.gmane.org>
	<4E610A0A.7040407@netwok.org>
Message-ID: <4EBFF65A.7010208@gmail.com>

Hi,

On 02/09/2011 19.53, ?ric Araujo wrote:
> Le 31/08/2011 20:13, Georg Brandl a ?crit :
>>> 1) When a commit message references more than one bug (with text
>>> matching #\d+), only the first gets a message for the changeset.  I
>>> would like all referenced bugs to get a message.
>> +1.  Just make sure that only issues that should be closed are closed
>> (i.e. if the commit message is """Close #1234: better fix than proposed
>> in #5678""", #1234 should be closed, and #5678 get a reference).
> You, Nick and Terry are +1, Ezio -1.  I originally changed my mind and
> agreed with Ezio after discussing it on IRC, on the basis that duplicate
> bug should be sorted out in the tracker, but the majority here is in
> favor.  I?ll wait a bit for other opinions.

Clearly with -1 I meant "wishes -= 1", since now even this last one 
should be fixed ;)
(http://hg.python.org/hooks/rev/ebdd1c1c365b)

Best Regards,
Ezio Melotti