In article <20130330141534.44893250BDD at webabinitio.net>, "R. David Murray" <rdmurray at bitdance.com> wrote: > This is the first time we've been in the situation of having a > security-only branch in Mercurial (other than 2.7, which is its own head). 3.1? -- Ned Deily, nad at acm.org