[python-committers] Commit rights to Ethan Furman

[Eli Bendersky]

Thanks!

I'll go ahead and point Ethan to the dev guide, so he'll send his SSH keys
to the appropriate place. Naturally I'm volunteering to mentor him in the
initial work he'll be doing as a Python core developer. We'll start with
getting an enum implementation committed (issue 17947). Since the
implementation will almost certainly be based in large parts on Ethan's
ref435 code, I think it's fair to let him commit that once it goes through
a review.

P.S. code review of on issue 17947 will be very much appreciated!

Eli



On Wed, May 8, 2013 at 4:07 PM, Terry Reedy <tjreedy at udel.edu> wrote:

>  On 5/8/2013 4:44 PM, Eli Bendersky wrote:
>
>  So I guess I can move forward with this unless there are objections in
> the next day or two,
>
>
> I have not responded before since Guido's approval seems sufficient ;-).
> The main concrete step is that one of the repository supervisors add his
> access key.
>
>    On Mon, May 6, 2013 at 7:46 AM, Barry Warsaw <barry at python.org> wrote:
>
>>  On May 03, 2013, at 08:59 PM, Eli Bendersky wrote:
>>
>> >I'd like to propose to grant Ethan Furman commit rights. He's authored
>> PEP
>> >309,
>>
>
> 409, not 309: http://www.python.org/dev/peps/pep-0409/
>
>
>      has been very helpful in the Enum saga (and is the de-facto author of
>> >the current reference implementation),
>>
>
> You, Barry, and Guido, who have also worked on enum, know him best and are
> the principle supporters of this proposal. I gather that you all agree that
> he has shown the 'cooperativeness' necessary to a collective project.
>
>
>      and has also been active on the tracker for a couple of years
>> (username stoneleaf).
>>
>
> As 'stoneleaf', he has been active on 12  issues since June 2010 (nosy on
> 2 more). One patch is open and 5 have been applied (3 by Nick, 1 each by
> Antoine and R. David),  I would say that the enum code, which appears to be
> on the way to acceptance,  is equivalent to a few more typical issue
> patches.
>
> FWIW, This is enough for a +1 from me.
>
>
>      I think he has already
>> >signed the contributor agreement, and explicitly expressed interest to
>> >contribute directly to PEP 435.
>>
>
> That is the enum PEP.  http://www.python.org/dev/peps/pep-0435/
> I consider a (nontrivial) reference implementation to be a direct
> contribution even if he has not yet been pushing text changes.
>
>
>      >Any objections?
>>
>>  +1 for Ethan.
>>
>
> --
> Terry Jan Reedy
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> python-committers mailing list
> python-committers at python.org
> http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-committers
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-committers/attachments/20130510/92aa8a0d/attachment.html>