[python-committers] Commit rights to Ethan Furman

[Eli Bendersky]

Thanks, Brett!


On Sat, May 11, 2013 at 7:54 AM, Brett Cannon <brett at python.org> wrote:

> Ethan should now have commit rights and be subscribed to this list.
>
> On Fri, May 10, 2013 at 9:08 AM, Eli Bendersky <eliben at gmail.com> wrote:
> > Thanks!
> >
> > I'll go ahead and point Ethan to the dev guide, so he'll send his SSH
> keys
> > to the appropriate place. Naturally I'm volunteering to mentor him in the
> > initial work he'll be doing as a Python core developer. We'll start with
> > getting an enum implementation committed (issue 17947). Since the
> > implementation will almost certainly be based in large parts on Ethan's
> > ref435 code, I think it's fair to let him commit that once it goes
> through a
> > review.
> >
> > P.S. code review of on issue 17947 will be very much appreciated!
> >
> > Eli
> >
> >
> >
> > On Wed, May 8, 2013 at 4:07 PM, Terry Reedy <tjreedy at udel.edu> wrote:
> >>
> >> On 5/8/2013 4:44 PM, Eli Bendersky wrote:
> >>
> >> So I guess I can move forward with this unless there are objections in
> the
> >> next day or two,
> >>
> >>
> >> I have not responded before since Guido's approval seems sufficient ;-).
> >> The main concrete step is that one of the repository supervisors add his
> >> access key.
> >>
> >> On Mon, May 6, 2013 at 7:46 AM, Barry Warsaw <barry at python.org> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> On May 03, 2013, at 08:59 PM, Eli Bendersky wrote:
> >>>
> >>> >I'd like to propose to grant Ethan Furman commit rights. He's authored
> >>> > PEP
> >>> >309,
> >>
> >>
> >> 409, not 309: http://www.python.org/dev/peps/pep-0409/
> >>
> >>
> >>> has been very helpful in the Enum saga (and is the de-facto author of
> >>> >the current reference implementation),
> >>
> >>
> >> You, Barry, and Guido, who have also worked on enum, know him best and
> are
> >> the principle supporters of this proposal. I gather that you all agree
> that
> >> he has shown the 'cooperativeness' necessary to a collective project.
> >>
> >>
> >>> and has also been active on the tracker for a couple of years (username
> >>> stoneleaf).
> >>
> >>
> >> As 'stoneleaf', he has been active on 12  issues since June 2010 (nosy
> on
> >> 2 more). One patch is open and 5 have been applied (3 by Nick, 1 each by
> >> Antoine and R. David),  I would say that the enum code, which appears
> to be
> >> on the way to acceptance,  is equivalent to a few more typical issue
> >> patches.
> >>
> >> FWIW, This is enough for a +1 from me.
> >>
> >>
> >>> I think he has already
> >>> >signed the contributor agreement, and explicitly expressed interest to
> >>> >contribute directly to PEP 435.
> >>
> >>
> >> That is the enum PEP.  http://www.python.org/dev/peps/pep-0435/
> >> I consider a (nontrivial) reference implementation to be a direct
> >> contribution even if he has not yet been pushing text changes.
> >>
> >>
> >>> >Any objections?
> >>>
> >>> +1 for Ethan.
> >>
> >>
> >> --
> >> Terry Jan Reedy
> >>
> >>
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> python-committers mailing list
> >> python-committers at python.org
> >> http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-committers
> >>
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > python-committers mailing list
> > python-committers at python.org
> > http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-committers
> >
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-committers/attachments/20130511/c3b53005/attachment.html>