From vinay_sajip at yahoo.co.uk  Tue Nov 11 13:00:57 2014
From: vinay_sajip at yahoo.co.uk (Vinay Sajip)
Date: Tue, 11 Nov 2014 12:00:57 +0000
Subject: [python-committers] PyCharm license
Message-ID: <1415707257.64095.YahooMailNeo@web172402.mail.ir2.yahoo.com>

I received today a one-year license from JetBrains for the PyCharm IDE (Professional) for use in Python development. According to my understanding, this is a multi-user license available to all CPython committers. If any of you are interested in using PyCharm, let me know off-list and I will forward the license details to you.

Regards,

Vinay Sajip

From antoine at python.org  Wed Nov 12 12:35:51 2014
From: antoine at python.org (Antoine Pitrou)
Date: Wed, 12 Nov 2014 12:35:51 +0100
Subject: [python-committers] "OpenID provider discovery failed"
Message-ID: <54634617.5010106@python.org>


Hello,

I get "OpenID provider discovery failed" when trying to log in on
https://bugs.python.org. It used to work. Did something change recently?

Thanks

Antoine.

From jcea at jcea.es  Wed Nov 12 13:25:55 2014
From: jcea at jcea.es (Jesus Cea)
Date: Wed, 12 Nov 2014 13:25:55 +0100
Subject: [python-committers] "OpenID provider discovery failed"
In-Reply-To: <54634617.5010106@python.org>
References: <54634617.5010106@python.org>
Message-ID: <546351D3.40208@jcea.es>

On 12/11/14 12:35, Antoine Pitrou wrote:
> I get "OpenID provider discovery failed" when trying to log in on
> https://bugs.python.org. It used to work. Did something change recently?

It works for me. I use "http://www.jcea.es/", that is delegated to
http://certifi.ca/.

-- 
Jes?s Cea Avi?n                         _/_/      _/_/_/        _/_/_/
jcea at jcea.es - http://www.jcea.es/     _/_/    _/_/  _/_/    _/_/  _/_/
Twitter: @jcea                        _/_/    _/_/          _/_/_/_/_/
jabber / xmpp:jcea at jabber.org  _/_/  _/_/    _/_/          _/_/  _/_/
"Things are not so easy"      _/_/  _/_/    _/_/  _/_/    _/_/  _/_/
"My name is Dump, Core Dump"   _/_/_/        _/_/_/      _/_/  _/_/
"El amor es poner tu felicidad en la felicidad de otro" - Leibniz

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 473 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-committers/attachments/20141112/a8fbb795/attachment.sig>

From michael at voidspace.org.uk  Wed Nov 12 13:29:08 2014
From: michael at voidspace.org.uk (Michael Foord)
Date: Wed, 12 Nov 2014 12:29:08 +0000
Subject: [python-committers] "OpenID provider discovery failed"
In-Reply-To: <54634617.5010106@python.org>
References: <54634617.5010106@python.org>
Message-ID: <54635294.7070105@voidspace.org.uk>


On 12/11/14 11:35, Antoine Pitrou wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I get "OpenID provider discovery failed" when trying to log in on
> https://bugs.python.org. It used to work. Did something change recently?
If you used to use MyOpenId as your provider then they shutdown and you 
need a new provider. I only discovered that it had finally happened not 
long ago when I tried to login to bugs.python.org.

Michael

> Thanks
>
> Antoine.
> _______________________________________________
> python-committers mailing list
> python-committers at python.org
> https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-committers


From antoine at python.org  Wed Nov 12 15:01:52 2014
From: antoine at python.org (Antoine Pitrou)
Date: Wed, 12 Nov 2014 15:01:52 +0100
Subject: [python-committers] "OpenID provider discovery failed"
In-Reply-To: <54634617.5010106@python.org>
References: <54634617.5010106@python.org>
Message-ID: <54636850.1040704@python.org>


For the record, my provider (https://ssl.pitrou.net/openid/antoine)
works properly on PyPI.


Le 12/11/2014 12:35, Antoine Pitrou a ?crit :
> 
> Hello,
> 
> I get "OpenID provider discovery failed" when trying to log in on
> https://bugs.python.org. It used to work. Did something change recently?
> 
> Thanks
> 
> Antoine.
> _______________________________________________
> python-committers mailing list
> python-committers at python.org
> https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-committers
> 

From barry at python.org  Wed Nov 12 15:30:12 2014
From: barry at python.org (Barry Warsaw)
Date: Wed, 12 Nov 2014 09:30:12 -0500
Subject: [python-committers] "OpenID provider discovery failed"
In-Reply-To: <54634617.5010106@python.org>
References: <54634617.5010106@python.org>
Message-ID: <20141112093012.2d297aa6@anarchist.wooz.org>

On Nov 12, 2014, at 12:35 PM, Antoine Pitrou wrote:

>I get "OpenID provider discovery failed" when trying to log in on
>https://bugs.python.org. It used to work. Did something change recently?

Launchpad still wfm.

-Barry

From antoine at python.org  Wed Nov 12 21:29:41 2014
From: antoine at python.org (Antoine Pitrou)
Date: Wed, 12 Nov 2014 21:29:41 +0100
Subject: [python-committers] [Infrastructure] "OpenID provider discovery
 failed"
In-Reply-To: <54636850.1040704@python.org>
References: <54634617.5010106@python.org> <54636850.1040704@python.org>
Message-ID: <5463C335.9060804@python.org>


This was solved after some investigation with Ezio. The ssl parameters
on the OpenID server were too strict (b.p.o runs an old Debian version).

Regards

Antoine.



Le 12/11/2014 15:01, Antoine Pitrou a ?crit :
> 
> For the record, my provider (https://ssl.pitrou.net/openid/antoine)
> works properly on PyPI.
> 
> 
> Le 12/11/2014 12:35, Antoine Pitrou a ?crit :
>>
>> Hello,
>>
>> I get "OpenID provider discovery failed" when trying to log in on
>> https://bugs.python.org. It used to work. Did something change recently?
>>
>> Thanks
>>
>> Antoine.
>> _______________________________________________
>> python-committers mailing list
>> python-committers at python.org
>> https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-committers
>>
> ________________________________________________
> Infrastructure mailing list
> Infrastructure at python.org
> https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/infrastructure
> Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/infrastructure/solipsis%40pitrou.net
> 

From brian at python.org  Fri Nov 14 00:04:18 2014
From: brian at python.org (Brian Curtin)
Date: Thu, 13 Nov 2014 17:04:18 -0600
Subject: [python-committers] MSDN Subscriptions/Renewals
Message-ID: <CAD+XWwqX8-vx+3KUKGWSa5YME7RUJ_PBj3CEz=EHBED0ixCMEA@mail.gmail.com>

Hey all,

Since I've gotten a couple of requests now for MSDN renewals, I may as
well try to do them in a big batch. If you have an MSDN subscription
that is expired or soon expiring, I can get you a renewal if you send
me the email address you use to login and your Subscriber ID. This is
found at https://msdn.microsoft.com/subscriptions/manage/

If you don't have a subscription but would like one - it gives you
access to Windows ISOs, Visual Studio, and other Microsoft software -
please send me your preferred email address, mailing address, and
telephone number, and I'll get you setup.

Brian Curtin

From ncoghlan at gmail.com  Fri Nov 14 03:08:14 2014
From: ncoghlan at gmail.com (Nick Coghlan)
Date: Fri, 14 Nov 2014 12:08:14 +1000
Subject: [python-committers] MSDN Subscriptions/Renewals
In-Reply-To: <CAD+XWwqX8-vx+3KUKGWSa5YME7RUJ_PBj3CEz=EHBED0ixCMEA@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAD+XWwqX8-vx+3KUKGWSa5YME7RUJ_PBj3CEz=EHBED0ixCMEA@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <CADiSq7ei+++oPcd5v+QefJnga9Y+7jPsF3kaPYSbaHYjysPNmA@mail.gmail.com>

On 14 November 2014 09:04, Brian Curtin <brian at python.org> wrote:

> Hey all,
>
> Since I've gotten a couple of requests now for MSDN renewals, I may as
> well try to do them in a big batch. If you have an MSDN subscription
> that is expired or soon expiring, I can get you a renewal if you send
> me the email address you use to login and your Subscriber ID. This is
> found at https://msdn.microsoft.com/subscriptions/manage/
>
> If you don't have a subscription but would like one - it gives you
> access to Windows ISOs, Visual Studio, and other Microsoft software -
> please send me your preferred email address, mailing address, and
> telephone number, and I'll get you setup.
>

Oh, that reminds me - we should mention the availability of Visual Studio
Community edition on python-dev, and likely update the developers guide to
recommend it to Windows based contributors.

I'll write something up for the list, and post a tracker issue for the
latter aspect.

Cheers,
Nick.

-- 
Nick Coghlan   |   ncoghlan at gmail.com   |   Brisbane, Australia
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-committers/attachments/20141114/e139e172/attachment.html>

From ncoghlan at gmail.com  Fri Nov 14 03:11:05 2014
From: ncoghlan at gmail.com (Nick Coghlan)
Date: Fri, 14 Nov 2014 12:11:05 +1000
Subject: [python-committers] MSDN Subscriptions/Renewals
In-Reply-To: <CADiSq7ei+++oPcd5v+QefJnga9Y+7jPsF3kaPYSbaHYjysPNmA@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAD+XWwqX8-vx+3KUKGWSa5YME7RUJ_PBj3CEz=EHBED0ixCMEA@mail.gmail.com>
 <CADiSq7ei+++oPcd5v+QefJnga9Y+7jPsF3kaPYSbaHYjysPNmA@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <CADiSq7cc=y2HfwRejiN6HRYY6+0evxq+bEa6wv+kBD-0Xi8xVA@mail.gmail.com>

On 14 November 2014 12:08, Nick Coghlan <ncoghlan at gmail.com> wrote:

> On 14 November 2014 09:04, Brian Curtin <brian at python.org> wrote:
>
>> Hey all,
>>
>> Since I've gotten a couple of requests now for MSDN renewals, I may as
>> well try to do them in a big batch. If you have an MSDN subscription
>> that is expired or soon expiring, I can get you a renewal if you send
>> me the email address you use to login and your Subscriber ID. This is
>> found at https://msdn.microsoft.com/subscriptions/manage/
>>
>> If you don't have a subscription but would like one - it gives you
>> access to Windows ISOs, Visual Studio, and other Microsoft software -
>> please send me your preferred email address, mailing address, and
>> telephone number, and I'll get you setup.
>>
>
> Oh, that reminds me - we should mention the availability of Visual Studio
> Community edition on python-dev, and likely update the developers guide to
> recommend it to Windows based contributors.
>
> I'll write something up for the list, and post a tracker issue for the
> latter aspect.
>

Oops, belay that - I realised there are associated problems with C runtime
versioning. I'll chime in on Steve's VS2015 thread instead.

Cheers,
Nick.

-- 
Nick Coghlan   |   ncoghlan at gmail.com   |   Brisbane, Australia
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-committers/attachments/20141114/0790eb06/attachment.html>

From antoine at python.org  Fri Nov 14 04:14:26 2014
From: antoine at python.org (Antoine Pitrou)
Date: Fri, 14 Nov 2014 04:14:26 +0100
Subject: [python-committers] MSDN Subscriptions/Renewals
In-Reply-To: <CADiSq7cc=y2HfwRejiN6HRYY6+0evxq+bEa6wv+kBD-0Xi8xVA@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAD+XWwqX8-vx+3KUKGWSa5YME7RUJ_PBj3CEz=EHBED0ixCMEA@mail.gmail.com>
 <CADiSq7ei+++oPcd5v+QefJnga9Y+7jPsF3kaPYSbaHYjysPNmA@mail.gmail.com>
 <CADiSq7cc=y2HfwRejiN6HRYY6+0evxq+bEa6wv+kBD-0Xi8xVA@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <54657392.3030109@python.org>


Le 14/11/2014 03:11, Nick Coghlan a ?crit :
>     Oh, that reminds me - we should mention the availability of Visual
>     Studio Community edition on python-dev, and likely update the
>     developers guide to recommend it to Windows based contributors.
> 
>     I'll write something up for the list, and post a tracker issue for
>     the latter aspect.
> 
> 
> Oops, belay that - I realised there are associated problems with C
> runtime versioning. I'll chime in on Steve's VS2015 thread instead.

The Express versions should be sufficient, except for testing 64-bit builds.

Regards

Antoine.

From Steve.Dower at microsoft.com  Fri Nov 14 17:47:49 2014
From: Steve.Dower at microsoft.com (Steve Dower)
Date: Fri, 14 Nov 2014 16:47:49 +0000
Subject: [python-committers] MSDN Subscriptions/Renewals
In-Reply-To: <54657392.3030109@python.org>
References: <CAD+XWwqX8-vx+3KUKGWSa5YME7RUJ_PBj3CEz=EHBED0ixCMEA@mail.gmail.com>
 <CADiSq7ei+++oPcd5v+QefJnga9Y+7jPsF3kaPYSbaHYjysPNmA@mail.gmail.com>
 <CADiSq7cc=y2HfwRejiN6HRYY6+0evxq+bEa6wv+kBD-0Xi8xVA@mail.gmail.com>
 <54657392.3030109@python.org>
Message-ID: <400812affc954c12b43783b7b07f8be6@DM2PR0301MB0734.namprd03.prod.outlook.com>

Antoine Pitrou wrote:
> Le 14/11/2014 03:11, Nick Coghlan a ?crit :
>>     Oh, that reminds me - we should mention the availability of Visual
>>     Studio Community edition on python-dev, and likely update the
>>     developers guide to recommend it to Windows based contributors.
>> 
>>     I'll write something up for the list, and post a tracker issue for
>>     the latter aspect.
>> 
>> 
>> Oops, belay that - I realised there are associated problems with C 
>> runtime versioning. I'll chime in on Steve's VS2015 thread instead.
> 
> The Express versions should be sufficient, except for testing 64-bit builds.

And Paul Moore is very close to having cloud-based VM images set up for people to do 64-bit builds, though I think he's skipping the VS 2010 installation.

As I understand it, there'll be a VS Community 2015 as well (though the Express editions are still part of the daily builds...), and if not the recent Express for Desktop builds don't have the 64-bit bug, so there'll certainly be a free VS that can develop/build/debug Python.

Hopefully we're quickly getting to the point where open-source devs don't need to worry about MSDN subscriptions :)

Cheers,
Steve

> Regards
> 
> Antoine.
>

From antoine at python.org  Fri Nov 14 18:10:44 2014
From: antoine at python.org (Antoine Pitrou)
Date: Fri, 14 Nov 2014 18:10:44 +0100
Subject: [python-committers] MSDN Subscriptions/Renewals
In-Reply-To: <400812affc954c12b43783b7b07f8be6@DM2PR0301MB0734.namprd03.prod.outlook.com>
References: <CAD+XWwqX8-vx+3KUKGWSa5YME7RUJ_PBj3CEz=EHBED0ixCMEA@mail.gmail.com>
 <CADiSq7ei+++oPcd5v+QefJnga9Y+7jPsF3kaPYSbaHYjysPNmA@mail.gmail.com>
 <CADiSq7cc=y2HfwRejiN6HRYY6+0evxq+bEa6wv+kBD-0Xi8xVA@mail.gmail.com>
 <54657392.3030109@python.org>
 <400812affc954c12b43783b7b07f8be6@DM2PR0301MB0734.namprd03.prod.outlook.com>
Message-ID: <54663794.5070007@python.org>


Le 14/11/2014 17:47, Steve Dower a ?crit :
> Antoine Pitrou wrote:
>> Le 14/11/2014 03:11, Nick Coghlan a ?crit :
>>>     Oh, that reminds me - we should mention the availability of Visual
>>>     Studio Community edition on python-dev, and likely update the
>>>     developers guide to recommend it to Windows based contributors.
>>>
>>>     I'll write something up for the list, and post a tracker issue for
>>>     the latter aspect.
>>>
>>>
>>> Oops, belay that - I realised there are associated problems with C 
>>> runtime versioning. I'll chime in on Steve's VS2015 thread instead.
>>
>> The Express versions should be sufficient, except for testing 64-bit builds.
> 
> And Paul Moore is very close to having cloud-based VM images set up for people to do 64-bit builds, though I think he's skipping the VS 2010 installation.
> 
> As I understand it, there'll be a VS Community 2015 as well (though the Express editions are still part of the daily builds...), and if not the recent Express for Desktop builds don't have the 64-bit bug, so there'll certainly be a free VS that can develop/build/debug Python.
> 
> Hopefully we're quickly getting to the point where open-source devs
don't need to worry about MSDN subscriptions :)

There's still the OS license, though :)

Regards

Antoine.

From vinay_sajip at yahoo.co.uk  Fri Nov 14 22:39:36 2014
From: vinay_sajip at yahoo.co.uk (Vinay Sajip)
Date: Fri, 14 Nov 2014 21:39:36 +0000 (UTC)
Subject: [python-committers] MSDN Subscriptions/Renewals
References: <CAD+XWwqX8-vx+3KUKGWSa5YME7RUJ_PBj3CEz=EHBED0ixCMEA@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <loom.20141114T223722-344@post.gmane.org>

Brian Curtin <brian <at> python.org> writes:

> Since I've gotten a couple of requests now for MSDN renewals, I may as
> well try to do them in a big batch. If you have an MSDN subscription
> that is expired or soon expiring, I can get you a renewal if you send
> me the email address you use to login and your Subscriber ID. This is
> found at https://msdn.microsoft.com/subscriptions/manage/

Mine expires on 4 March 2015 - I don't see that qualifying as "soon". Can I 
assume you'll be doing another batch perhaps early in 2015?

Regards,

Vinay Sajip


From larry at hastings.org  Mon Nov 24 04:48:24 2014
From: larry at hastings.org (Larry Hastings)
Date: Sun, 23 Nov 2014 19:48:24 -0800
Subject: [python-committers] Time for a 3.4.3?
Message-ID: <5472AA88.2060105@hastings.org>



3.4.2 rc1 was two months ago.  Time to start thinking about another 
point release?  I was thinking about 3.4.3 rc1 on Dec 13, then 3.4.3 
final on Dec 27.


//arry/
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-committers/attachments/20141123/1bdbb2ee/attachment.html>

From ncoghlan at gmail.com  Mon Nov 24 07:08:03 2014
From: ncoghlan at gmail.com (Nick Coghlan)
Date: Mon, 24 Nov 2014 16:08:03 +1000
Subject: [python-committers] Time for a 3.4.3?
In-Reply-To: <5472AA88.2060105@hastings.org>
References: <5472AA88.2060105@hastings.org>
Message-ID: <CADiSq7f0t6uS2EcKmrZmhAP84zf2mFGQt6i0yBMDC6e0j-yGUQ@mail.gmail.com>

On 24 November 2014 at 13:48, Larry Hastings <larry at hastings.org> wrote:
>
> 3.4.2 rc1 was two months ago.  Time to start thinking about another point
> release?  I was thinking about 3.4.3 rc1 on Dec 13, then 3.4.3 final on Dec
> 27.

If you and the other folks involved in releases are up for the faster
maintenance update cycle, I don't see any problem with the idea.

Cheers,
Nick.

-- 
Nick Coghlan   |   ncoghlan at gmail.com   |   Brisbane, Australia

From martin at v.loewis.de  Mon Nov 24 15:48:09 2014
From: martin at v.loewis.de (=?ISO-8859-1?Q?=22Martin_v=2E_L=F6wis=22?=)
Date: Mon, 24 Nov 2014 15:48:09 +0100
Subject: [python-committers] Time for a 3.4.3?
In-Reply-To: <5472AA88.2060105@hastings.org>
References: <5472AA88.2060105@hastings.org>
Message-ID: <54734529.8010201@v.loewis.de>

Am 24.11.14 04:48, schrieb Larry Hastings:
> 
> 
> 3.4.2 rc1 was two months ago.  Time to start thinking about another
> point release?  I was thinking about 3.4.3 rc1 on Dec 13, then 3.4.3
> final on Dec 27.

I'm travelling between Christmas and New Year. So it would be better to
do the release in early 2015.

Regards,
Martin



From larry at hastings.org  Sun Nov 30 18:05:25 2014
From: larry at hastings.org (Larry Hastings)
Date: Sun, 30 Nov 2014 09:05:25 -0800
Subject: [python-committers] Time for a 3.4.3?
In-Reply-To: <54734529.8010201@v.loewis.de>
References: <5472AA88.2060105@hastings.org> <54734529.8010201@v.loewis.de>
Message-ID: <547B4E55.6000308@hastings.org>

On 11/24/2014 06:48 AM, "Martin v. L?wis" wrote:
> Am 24.11.14 04:48, schrieb Larry Hastings:
>> 3.4.2 rc1 was two months ago.  Time to start thinking about another
>> point release?  I was thinking about 3.4.3 rc1 on Dec 13, then 3.4.3
>> final on Dec 27.
> I'm travelling between Christmas and New Year. So it would be better to
> do the release in early 2015.

Let's hold off entirely until next year then.  There's nothing of 
burning import waiting for 3.4.3, and trying to straddle the holidays 
would mean doing the RC a couple days before Christmas, which is a busy 
time for everybody.

See you next year,


//arry/
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-committers/attachments/20141130/c17ba0e6/attachment.html>