[python-committers] We will be moving to GitHub (hopefully) in2016

Brett Cannon brett at python.org
Mon Jan 4 17:56:57 EST 2016

On Mon, 4 Jan 2016 at 14:09 Guido van Rossum <guido at python.org> wrote:

> On Mon, Jan 4, 2016 at 1:50 PM, Donald Stufft <donald at stufft.io> wrote:
>> I'm not sure that you'd see much savings. You'd only get deltas that were
>> never merged to master excluded. Point taken though.
> Is the expectation that a Git clone would be significantly larger than an
> Hg clone of an equivalent repo? I currently often rely on a single Hg clone
> containing all branches.

I'm not sure, which is why I'm asking what difference it would make if we
separated out Python 2 branches into their own clone from Python 3 branches.

> +1 on not supporting ESR, for the stated reason.

+1 from me as well for not supporting ESR.


> --
> --Guido van Rossum (python.org/~guido)
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-committers/attachments/20160104/fb4167be/attachment.html>

More information about the python-committers mailing list