[python-committers] Pace of change for Python 3.x
Eric V. Smith
eric at trueblade.com
Wed Jan 25 07:45:05 EST 2017
On 1/25/2017 7:30 AM, Antoine Pitrou wrote:
>> We'd just say:
>> this is our new LTS release (e.g. Python 3.7) and then move on
>> until we're confident again that the feature set has stabilized
>> enough to create a new LTS release.
>
> In practice you wouldn't just "move on" but have to maintain that LTS
> release (which is the whole point). If we're talking something past the
> 2 years timerange, you can't just impose that on all core developers, so
> you need a subgroup of maintainers dedicated to that LTS release.
Channeling Nick, I'd say that LTS support should come from commercial
third parties, such as OS vendors. I agree with Antoine: it's not
something we want to impose on the core devs. How much fun is 2.7
maintenance?
Eric.
More information about the python-committers
mailing list