[python-committers] Turning off AppVeyor as required
Steve Dower
steve.dower at python.org
Mon Jun 4 13:31:19 EDT 2018
Correct, and I wasn't planning on it. The default VSTS machines don’t have the right compiler, and I’m not about to start managing VMs for 2.7 at this stage.
Top-posted from my Windows 10 phone
From: Victor Stinner
Sent: Monday, June 4, 2018 10:07
To: Steve Dower
Cc: python-committers
Subject: Re: [python-committers] Turning off AppVeyor as required
By the way, Python 2.7 doesn't have AppVeyor nor VSTS?
Is there a plan to add VSTS to Python 2.7?
Victor
2018-06-04 18:46 GMT+02:00 Steve Dower <steve.dower at python.org>:
> On 04Jun2018 0932, Victor Stinner wrote:
>>
>> 2018-06-04 18:18 GMT+02:00 Brett Cannon <brett at python.org>:
>>>
>>> I'm currently not in the mood to argue about VSTS' stability so I don't
>>> feel
>>> comfortable flipping that on as a requirement quite yet.
>>
>>
>> I don't suggest to make it mandatory right now.
>>
>> I will try to keep on eye on VSTS ;-)
>
>
> FWIW I had a quick look through the history of Windows commit builds on
> VSTS. There last three failures were:
> * test_subprocess getting wedged and the build timed out (surprisingly
> gracefully though, it sent a Ctrl+C to the app so we still got all the
> output)
> * Tcl/tk and/or OpenSSL build got stuck (this was on 3.6 - we don't build
> these every time as of 3.7)
> * test_asyncio issues
>
> Since the last of those issue, there have been 50-ish successful builds.
> (Note that I looked at commit builds, not PR builds, so I wouldn't have to
> wade through every single PR to see if it was a genuine bug.)
>
> You can review the history here:
>
> Windows commits:
> https://python.visualstudio.com/cpython/_build/index?definitionId=4&_a=history&path=%5C
> Windows PRs:
> https://python.visualstudio.com/cpython/_build/index?definitionId=9&_a=history&path=%5C
> macOS commits:
> https://python.visualstudio.com/cpython/_build/index?definitionId=5&_a=history&path=%5C
> macOS PRs:
> https://python.visualstudio.com/cpython/_build/index?definitionId=8&_a=history&path=%5C
> Linux commits:
> https://python.visualstudio.com/cpython/_build/index?definitionId=6&_a=history&path=%5C
> Linux PRs:
> https://python.visualstudio.com/cpython/_build/index?definitionId=7&_a=history&path=%5C
> Linux with code coverage:
> https://python.visualstudio.com/cpython/_build/index?definitionId=13&_a=history&path=%5C
> (both commits and PRs right now, still undecided how to best make use of
> this run, as we don't seem to report coverage stats anywhere?)
>
> Cheers,
> Steve
>
> _______________________________________________
> python-committers mailing list
> python-committers at python.org
> https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-committers
> Code of Conduct: https://www.python.org/psf/codeofconduct/
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-committers/attachments/20180604/5df53b10/attachment.html>
More information about the python-committers
mailing list