[python-committers] Poll: Do you like the PEP 572 Assignment Expressions?

[Nick Coghlan]

On 2 May 2018 at 19:49, Victor Stinner <vstinner at redhat.com> wrote:

> Hi,
>
> I would like to start a poll on Chris Angelico's PEP 572 "Assignment
> Expressions", restricted to Python core developers, to prepare the
> talk at the Language Summit:
>
>    https://www.python.org/dev/peps/pep-0572/
>
> The poll is on the *current* PEP. I propose 4 choices:
>
> * +1: you like the PEP
> * -1: you dislike the PEP
> * 0: you are not sure if you like it or not, or you have no opinon
> * don't reply to this poll :-)
>

-1 from me (on "too much pain for not enough gain" grounds).

Regards,
Nick.

P.S. I quite liked the initial "expr as name" version with subscopes, but
those aspects were changed based on reasonable concerns raised on
python-ideas, and I think the discussion of the simplified proposal on
python-dev has also raised sufficient further concerns to push the whole
concept back into python-ideas territory. (I do think the discussions have
clarified the nature of the cases where the current lack of any form of
inline binding support can be genuinely irritating, though)

-- 
Nick Coghlan   |   ncoghlan at gmail.com   |   Brisbane, Australia
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-committers/attachments/20180502/3d12d4c6/attachment-0001.html>