[Python-Dev] Re: [Distutils] Questions about distutils strategy
James C. Ahlstrom
jim@interet.com
Tue, 14 Dec 1999 08:26:50 -0500
Tim Peters wrote:
>
> [James C. Ahlstrom]
> > ...
> > Python seems to lack a CRC-32 function, so I wrote one
>
> Unfortunately, there are many different CRC functions in common use. None
> belong in md5; if the intent is to support just zip's version, adding a
> (say) zipcrc32 function to binascii would be ok; if we expect to support
> others as well, a new parameterized crc module would be in order.
OK, a CRC-32 in binascii it is. The CRC-32 I
have comes with these comments which seem to indicate it is a
more "official standard" CRC-32 than average:
# * Crc - 32 BIT ANSI X3.66 CRC checksum files
#*********************************************************************\
#* *|
#* Demonstration program to compute the 32-bit CRC used as the frame *|
#* check sequence in ADCCP (ANSI X3.66, also known as FIPS PUB 71 *|
#* and FED-STD-1003, the U.S. versions of CCITT's X.25 link-level *|
#* protocol). The 32-bit FCS was added via the Federal Register, *|
#* 1 June 1982, p.23798. I presume but don't know for certain that *|
#* this polynomial is or will be included in CCITT V.41, which *|
#* defines the 16-bit CRC (often called CRC-CCITT) polynomial. FIPS *|
#* PUB 78 says that the 32-bit FCS reduces otherwise undetected *|
#* errors by a factor of 10^-5 over 16-bit FCS. *|
#* *|
#*********************************************************************
#* Copyright (C) 1986 Gary S. Brown. You may use this program, or
#* code or tables extracted from it, as desired without restriction.
I can submit this as a patch to binascii, or if the Copyright bothers
anyone, maybe it is better for Guido to use his CRC-32 from his ZIP
code. Preference?
> > I can't seem to get WinZip to record a partial path. That is,
>
> dialog box, you need to cd to the *Lib* directory, check the "Save extra
> folder info" box, and then, e.g.,
Thanks. I knew there had to be some magic incantation to do it.
> 6. Use a comand-line zip tool instead (e.g., pkzip; I think WinZip has
> an "experimental" cmdline add-on too, but haven't tried it).
Actually pkzip 2.04g doesn't work because it writes names in upper case
and is limited to 8.3 names (I think). My zipfile.py can be used as
a basis for a command line tool. Actually I use makefiles with imbedded
Python programs and find this easier than command line tools.
JimA