[Python-Dev] Collection of typedefs for integral types
Thu, 6 Jul 2000 15:02:10 -0700
On Thu, Jul 06, 2000 at 05:37:56PM -0400, Tim Peters wrote:
> My position remains the same: adopt the C9X names for as many of the new
> integral synonyms as we *need*, but stick "Py_" in front of them.
Why should we insert the Py_ prefix? We can just use autoconf to test for
the types. If present, then we use them. If not, then we define our own
I see no particular reason to complicate it with Py_.
Greg Stein, http://www.lyra.org/