[PEP202 listcomps] (was RE: [Python-Dev] Product iteration)
Wed, 26 Jul 2000 22:02:17 +0200
On Wed, Jul 26, 2000 at 08:00:33AM -0500, Guido van Rossum wrote:
> > is there any special reason why we cannot use colon instead
> > of "for"?
> Would conflict with the proposed syntax for range literals. Both
> [x : x in seq]
> have the same syntactical form.
Much, much worse: the latter *is* a range literal. It's not likely to
produce anything useful, depending on 'x', but it is a valid range literal.
(It'll create a range from 'x' to '0', if 'x' is not in 'seq', or '1', if
'x' is in 'seq', using step 1.)
Thomas Wouters <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Hi! I'm a .signature virus! copy me into your .signature file to help me spread!