[Python-Dev] Reordering opcodes (PEP 203 Augmented Assignment)
Fri, 28 Jul 2000 17:32:56 +0200
On Fri, Jul 28, 2000 at 11:26:46AM -0400, Eric S. Raymond wrote:
> > LOAD_FAST(124) : 19323126 ================================
> > SET_LINENO(127) : 15055591 ========================
> 1. That looks as close to a Poisson distribution as makes no difference.
> I wonder what that means?
It means there's still room for optimization! Other than that, probably not
much. I also think that the similarity vanishes if you take into account
that SET_LINENO does nothing, and LOAD_FAST is a basic operation and should
be grouped with LOAD_NAME and LOAD_GLOBAL.
> 2. Microtuning in the implementations of the top 3 opcodes looks indicated,
> as they seem to constitute more than 50% of all calls.
Actually, I believe there was talk of removing SET_LINENO altogether... or
am I mistaken in that ? In any case, you can do it by using -OO.
> 3. On the other hand, what do you get when you weight these by average
> time per opcode?
My guess is that *_NAME moves on up, as they already are pretty high up, and
BINARY_* and UNARY_*, go *way* up: imagine all those classes that implement
__add__ and __not__. Even if you have but a few of those calls, they
effectively are (Python) function calls. In other words, those are pretty
Thomas Wouters <email@example.com>
Hi! I'm a .signature virus! copy me into your .signature file to help me spread!