Tue, 21 Nov 2000 22:33:03 -0800
By definition, isn't minidom supposed to be cheap/easy/quick? The quick
answer to a problem?
If somebody wants an exception-conforming DOM implementation with all the
bells and whistles, then they can go elsewhere. If minidom starts getting
loaded up, then it has kind of defeated its purpose, no?
On Tue, Nov 21, 2000 at 08:13:22PM -0800, Paul Prescod wrote:
> Tim Peters wrote:
> > Why not? I don't see any real difference between a core dump and an
> > uncaught & unexpected Python exception: in either case the program didn't
> > get the job done, and left stuff in an unknown state.
> A core dump would kill Zope, PythonWin, Alice etc. An exception does
> not. To me, that's a big difference. Also, Py_Object type checks are
> extremely cheap in C code. And once we put in the parameter checks the
> user will get an unexpected Python exception. Presumably they are not
> building faulty XML trees on purpose!
> Anyhow, I am won over despite your unpersuasive argument.
> I note that minidom will not always give you an exception for a poorly
> formed tree. That means that the programmer may not find her error until
> the XML is "out of Python's hands." It should give an exception sooner
> or later but not never.
> Paul Prescod
> Python-Dev mailing list
Greg Stein, http://www.lyra.org/