[Python-Dev] 2.1 alpha: what about the unicode name database?
Mon, 15 Jan 2001 10:44:14 +0100
Fredrik Lundh wrote:
> The name database portions of SF task 17335 ("add
> compressed unicode database") were postponed to
> My current patch replaces the ~450k large ucnhash
> module with a new ~160k large module. (See earlier
> posts for more info on how the new database works).
> Should I check it in?
Since the Unicode character names are probably
not used for performance sensitive tasks, I suggest to
checkin the smallest version possible.
If it is too much work to get Finn's version recoded in C
(presuming it's written in Java), then I'd suggest checking
in your version until someone comes up with a yet smaller
Python Pages: http://www.lemburg.com/python/