[Python-Dev] problems building Python 2.1a1 on QNX 4.25
Sun, 28 Jan 2001 18:39:58 +0100
On Sun, Jan 28, 2001 at 10:37:45AM +0100, Fredrik Lundh wrote:
> guido wrote:
> > > Revision 1.33 clearly leaves initial slashes untouched.
> > > I guess we should restore this...
> > Yes, please! (Just the "leading extra slashes stay" behavior.)
> just looked this up in the specs, and POSIX seem to
> require that leading slashes are preserved only if there
> are exactly two of them:
> A pathname that begins with two successive slashes
> may be interpreted in an implementation-dependent
> manner, although more than two leading slashes are
> treated as a single slash.
> (from susv2)
> maybe we should add a if len(slashes) > 2: slashes = "/"
> test to the patch?
How strictly do we need (or want, for that matter) to follow POSIX here ?
I'm aware the module is called 'posixpath', but it's used in a bit more than
just POSIX environments (or POSIX behaviours) so it might make sense to
ignore this particular tidbit. What if there is a system that attaches a
special meaning to ///, should we create a new path module for it ?
Thomas Wouters <email@example.com>
Hi! I'm a .signature virus! copy me into your .signature file to help me spread!