[Python-Dev] Re: Sets: elt in dict, lst.include
Mon, 29 Jan 2001 15:58:16 +0100
On Mon, Jan 29, 2001 at 09:48:22AM -0500, Guido van Rossum wrote:
> How about:
> for key in dict: ... # ... over keys
> for key:value in dict: ... # ... over items
> This is syntactically unambiguous (a colon is currently illegal in
> that position).
I won't comment on the syntax right now, I need to look at it for a while
first :-) However, what about MAL's point about dict ordering, internally ?
Wouldn't FOR_LOOP be forced to generate a list of keys anyway, to avoid
skipping keys ? I know currently the dict implementation doesn't do any
reordering except during adds/deletes, but there is nothing in the language
ref that supports that -- it's an implementation detail. Would we make a
future enhancement where (some form of) gc would 'clean up' large
dictionaries impossible ?
Thomas Wouters <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Hi! I'm a .signature virus! copy me into your .signature file to help me spread!