[Python-Dev] Re: Sets: elt in dict, lst.include
Wed, 31 Jan 2001 15:56:52 -0500
> x is sequence-like if it provides __getitem__() but not keys()
> So why does this barf?
> >>> .__getitem__
> Traceback (most recent call last):
> File "<stdin>", line 1, in ?
> AttributeError: __getitem__
> (Obviously, lists *do* understand __getitem__ at some level. Why
> isn't it exposed in the method table?)
The old type/class split: list is a type, and types spell their "method
tables" in ways that have little in common with how classes do it.
See PyObject_GetItem in abstract.c for gory details (e.g., dicts spell their
version of getitem via ->tp_as_mapping->mp_subscript(...), while lists spell
it ->tp_as_sequence->sq_item(...); neither has any binding to the attr
"__getitem__"; instance objects fill in both the tp_as_mapping and
tp_as_sequence slots, then map both the mp_subscript and sq_item slots to
classobject.c's instance_item, which in turn looks up "__getitem__").
bet-you're-sorry-you-asked<wink>-ly y'rs - tim