[Python-Dev] __future__ and the interactive interpreter prompt

[Jeremy Hylton]

>>>>> "GvR" == Guido van Rossum <guido@digicool.com> writes:

  GvR> I'm not keen on changing the prototypes for PyNode_Compile()
  GvR> and PyRun_InteractiveOne().  I suspect that folks doing funky
  GvR> stuff might be calling these directly.

  GvR> Would it be a great pain to add ...Ex() versions that take a
  GvR> session state, and have the old versions call this with a
  GvR> made-up dummy session state?

Doesn't seem like a big problem.  Any other issues with the approach?

Jeremy