[Python-Dev] Type/class
Jeremy Hylton
jeremy@digicool.com
Thu, 10 May 2001 17:59:34 -0400 (EDT)
>>>>> "PP" == Paul Prescod <paulp@ActiveState.com> writes:
PP> I would like to argue that "plain old C types" should act as if
PP> they have __dict__s for consistency with other types. It is
PP> sometimes useful to be able to annotate objects by adding
PP> attributes to them. But this only works with class instance
PP> objects, not instances of types.
Every type should have an __dict__ of type dict? Then every dict
must have an __dict__, including the __dict__ of __dict__?
Once every object has an __dict__, every object will be mutable. Then
no object will be usable as a dict key and we can get rid of dict's
entirely.
Jeremy