[Python-Dev] Re: Stability and change
Jeremy Hylton
jeremy@zope.com
Mon, 8 Apr 2002 18:33:55 -0400
>>>>> "PH" == Paul Hughett <hughett@mercur.uphs.upenn.edu> writes:
PH> As an extension developer, I see considerable advantages to
PH> having separate stable and experimental tracks, a la Linux.
Paul,
Do you ever do build Python from a cvs checkout? It seems to me that
what you call an experimental track, we call a "cvs checkout." What
you call a stable releases, we call a release.
PH> The key distinction, as I see it, is that the stable track has
PH> most of the bugs fixed, is recommended for production use
PH> (though not perfect), and that any code that works with stable
PH> version N will almost certainly work with version N+1, but it
PH> doesn't have all the latest and greatest features.
I think all of this was true of Python 2.1 & 2.2 and will be true of
2.3.
Sure, there are bugs in 2.1 & 2.2, but we fixed the ones we knew how
to fix. I expect that "stable" Linux kernel releases also have bugs,
else I wouldn't have a 2.2.12 release on my home machine :-).
Jeremy