[Python-Dev] _sre as part of python.dll
Martin v. Loewis
08 Aug 2002 22:42:31 +0200
Guido van Rossum <email@example.com> writes:
> But is the startup time of apps that use a lot of stuff the most
> important thing? I'd say that the startup time of apps that *don't*
> use a lot of stuff is more important. I'm not sure that making the
> binary bigger doesn't slow it down.
I'm pretty sure that it doesn't. On Unix, the system performs a
copy-on-write mmap of the executable. No disk access is done until
page faults trigger a disk read. I believe Windows uses a similar
mechanism. The size of the executable is irrelevant (if you have no
relocations); only the part of the executable that is used matters.
On the other hand, on my Linux installation, importing a module costs
35 system calls if the module is not found, and no PYTHONPATH is set;
every directory in PYTHONPATH adds four additional system calls.
> Yes, please. We switched to building almost all extensions as shared
> libs when we switched away from Modules/Setup to setup.py.
For modules that require configuration, this was a good thing - now
setup.py will autoconfigure them. For modules that require no
additional libraries, I hope that this decision will be reverted some