[Python-Dev] Re: PEP 218 (sets); moving set.py to Lib

[Greg Ewing]

pinard@iro.umontreal.ca (=?iso-8859-1?q?Fran=E7ois?= Pinard):

> Eric has offered the idea of adding Cartesian product, and despite the
> usual notation is a tall thin `X', maybe it would be nice reserving
> `*' for that?

Maybe '%'? It looks a bit X-ish.

Or if Python ever gets a dedicated matrix-multiplication
operator, maybe that could be reused.

Greg Ewing, Computer Science Dept, +--------------------------------------+
University of Canterbury,	   | A citizen of NewZealandCorp, a	  |
Christchurch, New Zealand	   | wholly-owned subsidiary of USA Inc.  |
greg@cosc.canterbury.ac.nz	   +--------------------------------------+