[Python-Dev] Re: PEP 218 (sets); moving set.py to Lib
Eric S. Raymond
Wed, 21 Aug 2002 05:05:27 -0400
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Martin Sj=F6gren <email@example.com>:
> > Is it + for disjunction and juxtaposition for conjunction, or the other
> > way around? Not that I've ever seen either variant.
> I've often seen it in the context of electronics. a+1 =3D 1, a0 =3D 0 and=
> on. That is, + is disjunction and juxtaposition (or a multiplication
> dot) is conjunction.
Makes sense. Hardware designers care a lot about reduction to disjunctive
normal form. Much more than logicians do, actually.
> Hmm, I just realized that I've also seen it in an American book on
> discrete maths, so it's not just us Swedes ;)
Odd that I haven't encountered it.
<a href=3D"http://www.tuxedo.org/~esr/">Eric S. Raymond</a>
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----