[Python-Dev] PEP 298
Martin v. Löwis
martin@v.loewis.de
14 Dec 2002 22:45:00 +0100
Thomas Heller <theller@python.net> writes:
> If I understand the PEP process correctly, the PEP is alive until
> there is a definite pronouncement on it.
That is certainly the case.
> A 'locked buffer' object could be built if the PEP is implemented,
> should it be part of the PEP? But if you expose the buffer address
> to Python as an integer, you're living dangerous again.
Why is that? Why does it add a danger that would not be there without
it.
It would be dangerous if you could create a buffer object by passing
an arbitrary integer, but I'm not proposing such a thing.
Regards,
Martin