[Python-Dev] proposal: add basic time type to the standard library
Tue, 26 Feb 2002 09:04:27 -0500
Guido van Rossum wrote:
> > http://effbot.org/ideas/time-type.htm
> > I can produce PEP and patch if necessary.
> Yes, a PEP, please! Jim Fulton has been asking for this for a long
> time too. His main requirement is that timestamp objects are small,
> both in memory and as pickles, because Zope keeps a lot of these
I also need time-zone support.
> They are currently represented either as long ints (with a
> little under 64 bits) or as 8-byte strings.
ZODB has a TimeStamp type that uses a 32-bit unsigned integer
to store year, month,, day, hour, and minute in a way that makes it dirt
simple to extract a component. It uses a 32-bit integer to store
seconds in units of 60/2**32 seconds.
This type isn't appropriate for general use because it only allows
dates later than Dec 31, 1899.
> A dedicated timestamp
> object could be smaller than that.
A type that only needed minute precision could easily be expressed
with 32-bits. Of course, the two-word object overhead makes the difference
between 32-bits and 64-bits rather unexciting.
> Your idea of a base type (which presumably standarizes at least one
> form of representation) sounds like a breakthrough that can help
> satisfy different other needs.
Jim Fulton mailto:email@example.com Python Powered!
CTO (888) 344-4332 http://www.python.org
Zope Corporation http://www.zope.com http://www.zope.org