[Python-Dev] Re: OS/2 EMX changes to dynload_shlib.c
Guido van Rossum
Wed, 27 Feb 2002 07:40:01 -0500
> On Tue, 26 Feb 2002, Guido Van Rossum wrote:
> > Given the number of OS/2 EMX specific changes to
> > dynload_shlib.c, wouldn't it be better to create a
> > separate dynload_os2.c?
> Its just occurred to me that you might in fact be referring to the changes
> to import.c, which were in the same commit (& thus the same checkin
> message) and were extensive. I did try to make it clear in the checkin
> message that changes to multiple files were committed.
> It seems to be de rigeur to commit a single file at a time; something I
> hadn't appreciated and don't remember being advised about. I will follow
> this practive from now on.
No need -- you're right, I mistook the diff, but that's purely my
fault. Multi-file commits are quite common when they're related.
--Guido van Rossum (home page: http://www.python.org/~guido/)