[Python-Dev] long long configuration
Tim Peters
tim.one@comcast.net
Fri, 12 Jul 2002 14:01:58 -0400
[David Abrahams]
>>> Just addressing the <0.1 wink> you left out: even if I get the include
>>> order "right", my users are still screwed if they don't do it the
>>> same way.
>> Give them a pythonboost.h instead that contains the includes in
>> the right order, or make your boost.h smarter, or ...
> You fixed the LONGLONG_MAX stuff already, so I don't think
> there's anything to discuss here, is there?
I thought you thought there was, else there was no apparent reason for the
"Just addressing" message I replied to.
BTW, do you need this in 2.2.2 too, or is 2.3 good enough? I didn't change
anything on the 2.2 branch.