[Python-Dev] Single- vs. Multi-pass iterability
Guido van Rossum
guido@python.org
Fri, 19 Jul 2002 20:41:18 -0400
> Would it be good to use __next__() if it exists, else try next()?
Then the code in typeobject.c (e.g. resolve_slotdups) would have to
map tp_iternext to *both* __next__ and next.
> This doesn't fix the current 'wart,' however, it could allow
> moving closer to the desired end. It could cause confusion.
> For compatability, one would only need to do:
>
> next = __next__
>
> or vica versa.
>
> Not sure this is worth it. But if there is a transition, it could
> ease the pain.
I don't think it's worth it.
--Guido van Rossum (home page: http://www.python.org/~guido/)