[Python-Dev] Single- vs. Multi-pass iterability
Greg Ewing
greg@cosc.canterbury.ac.nz
Mon, 22 Jul 2002 11:35:38 +1200 (NZST)
Ka-Ping Yee <ping@zesty.ca>:
> I believe this is where the biggest debate lies: whether "for" should be
> non-destructive.
It's not the for-loop's fault if it's argument is of such a nature
that iterating over it destroys it.
Given suitable values for x and y, it's possible for evaluating "x+y"
to be a destructive operation. Does that mean we should revise the
"+" protocol somehow to prevent this from happening? I don't think so.
This sort of thing is all-pervasive in Python due to its dynamic
nature. It's not something that can be easily "fixed", even if it were
desirable to do so.
Greg Ewing, Computer Science Dept, +--------------------------------------+
University of Canterbury, | A citizen of NewZealandCorp, a |
Christchurch, New Zealand | wholly-owned subsidiary of USA Inc. |
greg@cosc.canterbury.ac.nz +--------------------------------------+