[Python-Dev] Oberver Pattern
Fri, 10 May 2002 19:15:42 -0400
From: "Guido van Rossum" <firstname.lastname@example.org>
> Again, I think you are being just a dat naive here -- all those jumps
> (that are nearly always taken!) add up, and you're proposing to add
> this to every mutable object.
How about a simpler alternative?
Have just a single field in PyObject_HEAD, int cache_valid.
Update routines wouldn't even need a jump.
Everywhere the object assigns a value to ob_item[i], it would also run:
PyObject_INVALIDATE_CACHE which would expand to:
The only services would be macros for PyObject_IS_CACHE_VALID(obj)
> If you *have* to do this, I would implement (at the C level) just a
> single observer object. If multiple observers are needed, this can
> easily be done using an adapter in Python.
Will do. Since it's not that hard to implement (meaning, less time than
I spent on iterzip), I may as well try it and time it.