[Python-Dev] Re: [Python-checkins] python/dist/src/Lib types.py,1.26,1.27

[Martin v. Loewis]

Kevin Jacobs <jacobs@penguin.theopalgroup.com> writes:

> Pointless semantic arguments aside, I agree with Skip.  I don't care how
> many other ways we provide to spell types: until the types module is
> depricated, I do not see why it should be intentionally broken by not
> covering all builtin types (unless thus breaking the module is a slimy way
> of encouraging its deprication, in which case I will object on procedural
> grounds).

Nobody suggested to break the types module; not adding BooleanType
would not break it.

Regards,
Martin