[getopt-sig] Re: [Python-Dev] Adopting Optik
Thu, 14 Nov 2002 15:08:15 -0500
After reading this thread, it seems kind of shame we can't do
from parselib import OptionParser
which could match with UrlParser and ConfigParser. But, that being
said, I like either Guido's "optparse" or the OptionParser name in the
On Thu, Nov 14 @ 10:38, Michael McLay wrote:
> On Thursday 14 November 2002 01:18 am, David Ascher wrote:
> > David Abrahams wrote:
> > >-1 on optlib (sounds like optimization)
> > Agreed, especially with the parenthetical comment.
> > I don't like argvparse much because this "argv" thing is far from
> > obvious to newbies. But given those two choices, I'd pick argvparse
> > over optlib.
> I was just about to say the same thing about "argv".
> How about calling it cmdoptionslib or optionslib.
> For a newbie just using the word "options" makes it diffcult to locate
> references using google, etc. On google optionlib had three pages of hits,
> optionslib had two hits and cmdoptionslib had no hits.
> Python-Dev mailing list
For my gpg public key: