[Python-Dev] vox populii illiterati
Samuele Pedroni
pedronis@bluewin.ch
Sun, 9 Feb 2003 17:54:24 +0100
From: "Neal Norwitz" <neal@metaslash.com>
> One thing to note, many people are saying you can currently do:
>
> cond and true_value or false_value
>
> However, many have gotten it wrong, either by reversing the true/false
> value or by using something in the true_value which may be false
> (sometimes even constants). pychecker tries to find this condition
> (when true_value is a false constant), but it does a poor job
> of determining the idiom IIRC.
that's why the real one (if any) should be spelled
cond and! true_val or! false_val
<.5 wink>.
Sorry I couldn't resist.