[Python-Dev] Traceback problem
Guido van Rossum
guido@python.org
Mon, 24 Feb 2003 20:57:40 -0500
[Guido]
> > I believe that Stackless supports Python 2.1 or older, and we're not
> > adding features. Even if Stackless supported Python 2.2, adding a new
> > feature would be iffy.
[Christian]
> Huh? What makes you believe that?
I thought quite a while ago you announced you were giving up the old
stackless code. I must have misunderstood.
> I'm talking of 2.3, of course.
But without GC, right? Or did I misunderstand that too? I thought
you told me that your customers didn't want GC enabled? But in 2.3 GC
can't be disabled. So I guess I'm unclear on what you want.
> I would also like to point out that the documentation
> of sys.exc_info is very misleading, and I always
> programmed acording to this false information:
>
> """
> >>> print sys.exc_info.__doc__
> exc_info() -> (type, value, traceback)
>
> Return information about the exception that is currently being handled.
> This should be called from inside an except clause only.
> >>>
> """
It's pretty complex to explain the actual behavior, so I gave a
recipe that's a little more restricted but is guaranteed to work.
> Where I have to say that I'm in favor of doing like
> the documentation claims.
Too bad, that would definitely break existing code.
[And later, Guido]
> > Well, Christian explained that it was a problem because they have
> > 1000s of threads.
[Christian]
> Yeah. But standard CPython can exploit the same thing, with a
> handful of real threads, which happen to catch exceptions
> from, say, a very deep, very memory consming chain of frames.
> These are all kept alive, and from the documentation,
> people don't expect this!
Who reads documentation. :-)
> ...
>
> > I don't have time to write the code, but I'll entertain a patch before
> > 2.3b1.
>
> I was about to supply a patch, that's why I asked for
> the right syntax. Do you want an extra function of which name,
> or do you like a default arg to exc_info?
> Both patches should not take me more than 1/2 hour, or I
> should better give up on programming and become a farmer.
You and Kevin Jacobs can argue about the syntax.
--Guido van Rossum (home page: http://www.python.org/~guido/)