[Python-Dev] Trouble with Python 2.3a1

[David Abrahams]

--=-=-=


Ralf describes below a change in the name of classes defined in the
__main__ module for 2.3a1, which causes some of our tests to fail.
Was it intentional?


--=-=-=
Content-Type: message/rfc822
Content-Disposition: inline

X-From-Line: rwgk@cci.lbl.gov  Mon Jan 6 15:00:56 2003
Return-Path: <rwgk@cci.lbl.gov>
Received: from boa.lbl.gov ([128.3.132.98] verified)
  by stlport.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 3.5.9)
  with ESMTP id 162837 for dave@boost-consulting.com; Mon, 06 Jan 2003
 15:00:57 -0800
Received: (from rwgk@localhost)
	by boa.lbl.gov (8.11.6/8.11.6) id h06N0uv368572;
	Mon, 6 Jan 2003 15:00:56 -0800 (PST)
Date: Mon, 6 Jan 2003 15:00:56 -0800 (PST)
From: "Ralf W. Grosse-Kunstleve" <rwgk@cci.lbl.gov>
Message-Id: <200301062300.h06N0uv368572@boa.lbl.gov>
To: dave@boost-consulting.com
Subject: Trouble with Python 2.3a1
Cc: rwgk@boa.lbl.gov
X-Content-Length: 399
Lines: 17
Xref: NEFARIOUS mail.misc:17942
MIME-Version: 1.0

Hi David,

I am back from my trip and I thought it is time to test our stuff with
Python 2.3a1. Using the boost 1.29.0 release pickling of simple
extension classes fails. I tracked this down to the following
difference:

Python 2.2:
<class 'cctbx_boost.uctbx_ext.unit_cell'>

Python 2.3a1:
<class '__main__.cctbx_boost.uctbx_ext.unit_cell'>

Have you encountered this already?

Thanks,
        Ralf

--=-=-=



-- 
                       David Abrahams
   dave@boost-consulting.com * http://www.boost-consulting.com
Boost support, enhancements, training, and commercial distribution

--=-=-=--